SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
George Gilder - Forbes ASAP
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5853 405 0
Emcee:  Brad Rogers Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5628LOL, Maurice, I get up every day and notice that the sun revolves around the earDan B.-4/14/2001
5627Greetings Maurice: GG's statement sounds vaguely similar to the oft repeateRon M-4/14/2001
5626LOL... the first of four in a row good for a morning laugh! Palm Reader, good cDan B.-4/14/2001
5625GG thinks that machines can't think? Crikey, he's really losing his griMaurice Winn-4/14/2001
5624Can anyone confirm GG really was so out of his mind that he suggested QUALCOMM cMaurice Winn-4/14/2001
5623Its actually quite amusing. They act like w.o. Gilder, Avanex would be a penny greedsgd_2000-4/14/2001
5622I went to a Palm Reader: she told me "Buy Avanex"greedsgd_2000-4/14/2001
5621I'd like to believe you 100% on the science here. You've said what I imDan B.-4/14/2001
5620Dan B: First, GG's major proposition was that there is some fundamental difOWN STOCK-4/13/2001
5619Mr. Gilder presented both Franks thought in the past, and the basic H.S. textbooDan B.-4/13/2001
5618I will admit is was a pleasant way for them to get "cleaned out"...butOWN STOCK-4/12/2001
5617Buying them isn't exactly what most people would consider "cleaning theKent Rattey-4/12/2001
5616M. You are right, and wrong, and right. It does in fact imply at least a dietyOWN STOCK-4/12/2001
5615The latest. I did quote it by the way, for editorial purposes. The entire releOWN STOCK-4/12/2001
5614Avanex is ETEK Dynamics redux...Simon Cao...JDS bought them, and Simon left...toOWN STOCK-4/12/2001
5613I said earlier, I think Franks comments were in fact right on the money as to thDan B.-4/12/2001
5612As to AVNX...that would have been a good play if they had completely left SilliVKent Rattey-4/12/2001
5611Franks comments were out of context conjecture. Based on the context, if GG werOWN STOCK-4/12/2001
5610Well, blush, I thought you were probably right at first! EOM Dan BDan B.-4/12/2001
5609Dan, I stand corrected. "Blasphemy" can in fact be directed at one oM. Charles Swope-4/12/2001
5608You may not have noticed, but Frank offered an explanation plausible(and if memoDan B.-4/12/2001
5607Dan B: Opinions are neither false nor true; that is why they are called opinionOWN STOCK-4/12/2001
5606Misuse? Good point. I've always, if mistakenly, considered the word could Dan B.-4/12/2001
5605Equating criticism of GG on moral grounds or any other with "blasphemy"M. Charles Swope-4/12/2001
5604Well said, I agree in all respects, of course. EOM Dan BDan B.-4/12/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):