SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Warp 10 Tech. (WARP)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1164 3 0 WARP
Emcee:  Glenn Perry Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
564 I hope alot of you took my advice and took a look at IZP because it is <b>stock talk-2/22/1997
563 <<< Jan 30 1997 10:38PMstock talk-2/22/1997
562 <<<To: Martin Archer (517 ) From: frank monroe stock talk-2/22/1997
561 So at 1.5 a share, after commish, sounds like there is no point in selling anymJordan M. Fiddle-2/19/1997
560 Oh, they're smart all right. Look folks it's pretty obvious. Their reWhite Shoes-2/19/1997
559 Either WARPF is a total disaster or those who run the company are a lot smarterChristopher-2/18/1997
558 Bobbie, Unlike WARPF, some of the companies you mention (CAWS, WSTL) are real White Shoes-2/14/1997
557 Up over $2 again. The worst is probably over. Got out too soon. Burning $800Zencone-2/13/1997
556 An optimist as I....SteveIN_GOD_I_TRUST-2/7/1997
555 A glimmer of hope...but we have to see something positive. After all, the histIN_GOD_I_TRUST-2/7/1997
554 Timber.Paul Henderson-2/6/1997
553 From the info. I got from the company. The rumer seems to be true, But they wiE Newman-2/6/1997
552 Better than 25% down...which happens often with this one...SteveIN_GOD_I_TRUST-2/6/1997
551 up 25% and yawn... JJordan M. Fiddle-2/6/1997
550 Geist is still "cautiously bullish" on WARPF whereas he is now bearisPeter Norstrom-2/5/1997
549 TO ALL: Anyone received copy of the latest Annual Report? Does it provide anycharlotte levy-2/5/1997
548 May I suggest that either you or someone else in this forum try contacting Richjames bisczat-2/4/1997
547 Just think: If the price of the stock goes NEGATIVE, that measns the P/E ratioJohn L Addessi-2/4/1997
546 So, after going from 10 to 17.5 to under 2, anyone bullish here???????? Or areJordan M. Fiddle-2/4/1997
545 This company has had a checkered past, but to assert that it currently is a farhugh thorne-2/2/1997
544 Peter,don't really know anything beyond the fact that they apparently met; hugh thorne-2/2/1997
543 The "detective"'s article can be seen from post #229. Good luck tBobbie Lee-2/2/1997
542 Frank, This piece of @#$% company is something else. I came back to see thisBobbie Lee-2/2/1997
541 Don't worry. IF their technology is worth anything they will sign an agreemDavid Coakley-2/1/1997
540 Hugh, no I didn't. Do you know something WARPF shareholders might want to Peter Norstrom-2/1/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News