SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Market Makers; What They Do vs What We Want
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
207 13 0
Emcee:  Doug R Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
57 It is my understanding that 'Institutions' do after hour trading... theBishopsChild-4/20/1997
56 Yeah, that Instinet stuff bothers me too. It was mentioned on this thread thatDoug R-4/20/1997
55 To All who gets to do after hour tradeing,This is not fair if you ask me ,lookSellShort-4/20/1997
54 Joe: What do you mean by "I make my own bid..." Thanks! wbw-4/20/1997
53 Another interesting take: businessweek.comMighty_Mezz-4/20/1997
52 <b>NASDAQ MARKET MAKERS</b> dppl.comBishopsChild-4/20/1997
51 I dont know if you are aware of this... RE: author of the link you posted. secBishopsChild-4/20/1997
50 Doug: i have never had problems with waterhouse Sec. excepting stop loses on naInstock-4/20/1997
49 <b>Requirements for market makers.</b> In order for a firm (or an iBishopsChild-4/20/1997
48 >More than you ever wanted or needed to know about the evil, dreaded MM maniIceberg-4/19/1997
47 Jeffery, Couldn't you have at least spread that out a little bit? (LOL!) Doug R-4/19/1997
46 The MM files<GG> <i>More than you ever wanted or needed to know abJeffery E. Forrest-4/19/1997
45 >If someone doesn't have a clue as to what a MM is, they have been screwIceberg-4/19/1997
44 Doug, I've got a couple questions if you find someone in the know who willSteven Bowen-4/19/1997
43 > was just trying to differentiate between theory and practice. Doug, ThIceberg-4/19/1997
42 Doug, good idea for a thread. At first I wondered why it would be needed, but aJeffery E. Forrest-4/19/1997
41 Ice, I don't wish to confuse either. I was just trying to differentiate Doug R-4/19/1997
40 >I am always skeptical of the term "perfect". Especially where stoIceberg-4/19/1997
39 Ice, I am always skeptical of the term "perfect". Especially where Doug R-4/19/1997
38 Doug, Tom Hayden's post seems to reinforce the concept of a "perfect Iceberg-4/19/1997
37 Ice, Good job, thanx. Done. Doug RDoug R-4/19/1997
36 >OK, do we all have him peoplemarked? >Should we invite him over? >Do Iceberg-4/19/1997
35 All, OK, do we all have him peoplemarked? Should we invite him over? Do you haDoug R-4/19/1997
34 To All: here is an interesting post re: market makers--enjoy... exchange2000.Iceberg-4/19/1997
33 >I think Larry S. gave the thread a very good description of what market makIceberg-4/19/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):