SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Cell Therapeutics (CTIC)
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
946 45 0 CTIC
Emcee:  Regis McConnell Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
571<i>>>I bring up economics because paclitaxel is generic. Although CTDewDiligence_on_SI-3/7/2005
570Sam, sorry for any confusion..by deal breaker I was saying that if Xyotax indeedzeta1961-3/7/2005
569<i>>>That can easily happen if the two arms turn out not to be balanDewDiligence_on_SI-3/7/2005
568Zeta, I didn't mean to interrupt your conversation with former_pgs, but wasSam Citron-3/7/2005
567Sounds like, from the cc this morning, that Bianco and co. at least believe theyRudy Saucillo-3/7/2005
566<i> I don't understand how the Cox regression can be highly stat sig wBiomaven-3/7/2005
565<i>Why is this issue a "dealbreaker"?</i> Sam this is parzeta1961-3/7/2005
564<i>alopecia is a side effect that is underappreciated as an issue and imo,Sam Citron-3/7/2005
563Did they say how much less alopecia the xyvotox had? I once knew someone that rkrw-3/7/2005
562<If it was up to me I'd let the clinics decide the cost / benefit trade-ozeta1961-3/7/2005
561<i>>> Neither of these statements make a lot of sense to me. I don&#DewDiligence_on_SI-3/7/2005
560<<Normally the allocation to the two arms is completely randomized - the dClarksterh-3/7/2005
559Unfortunately, Xyotax did not appear to appreciably reduce the incidence of blooformer_pgs-3/7/2005
558It's an interesting and relatively short call. Several times, during the caIan@SI-3/7/2005
557<i>found a way around the stratification</i> I didn't listen toBiomaven-3/7/2005
556Probably the most interesting items (to me) in the cc were: 1) The fact that thClarksterh-3/7/2005
555I'm going to revisit the CC. Maybe I can pick something up that I missed in mangery-3/7/2005
554I didn't listen to the CC yet since I knew I was going to sell based on the zeta1961-3/7/2005
553Yes, he appeared to be rather subdued. But the circumstances were maybe not the Icebrg-3/7/2005
552<i>But, as we don't know how Xyotax fared from an efficacy point of vimangery-3/7/2005
551<I bring up economics because paclitaxel is generic.> Has anyone here seezeta1961-3/7/2005
550First thing first. If approved the market will at least be large enough to make Icebrg-3/7/2005
549>It is not only a matter of alopecia. Not being based on Cremafore is anotherformer_pgs-3/7/2005
548If CTI is able to prove to the satisfaction of FDA's statisticians, that theIcebrg-3/7/2005
547They will just change their let down day to Friday since you post that last postmanny_velasco-3/7/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):