SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
USRX News -- Just the Facts
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1049 2 0
Emcee:  Michael Burry Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
574 No where's that famous sense of humor we've seen so much of recently, DIngotWeTrust-12/24/1996
573 Lucius, you understand the situation quite well. DavidDavid Lawrence-12/24/1996
572 Thanks David, I'll follow the threads further back. I doubt if the non-modmauser96-12/24/1996
571 Lucius, according to USR management at their last earnings press conference, asDavid Lawrence-12/24/1996
570 Most of the discussions on this thread have concerned US Robotics efforts in thmauser96-12/24/1996
569 David in your first scenario it would depend on how well x2 equipment and modemScrapps-12/24/1996
568 Scrapps....................., Let's say that x2 hits the street next monthDavid Lawrence-12/23/1996
567 Nice answer David. I wonder if we might see sort of a reverse situation, where Marshall-12/23/1996
566 David you could email these folks and ask them..... x2.usr.com I have never sScrapps-12/23/1996
565 Scrapps: I have been monitoring this thread for several months now. I am longDennis O'Day Leslie-12/23/1996
564 Well, I'm absolutely certain that either they will or they will not. I'David Lawrence-12/23/1996
563 Surcharges on Taxpayers during the Nixon Administration never chased away taxfiIngotWeTrust-12/23/1996
562 IMO A surcharge for 56k is nonsense and we'll never pay for it let alone seScrapps-12/23/1996
561 The <b>S</b>ide<b>L</b>ine <b>B</b>ar &IngotWeTrust-12/23/1996
560 >BTW, what's/where's SLB&G? Wait, I want to take a stab at thatDavid Lawrence-12/23/1996
559 NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK, U.S.A., 1996 DEC 20 (NB) -- By Bob Woods. US RoboticsTulvio Durand-12/23/1996
558 Congrats, Ole. Here's upward revised earnings estimate from Zacks. Not Tulvio Durand-12/23/1996
557 David, could we view the larger bandwidth as producing a more efficient net, onTulvio Durand-12/23/1996
556 Not at the moment, Tulvio...am @ SLB&G looking for a re-entry point to eithIngotWeTrust-12/23/1996
555 Tulvio, ............. Perhaps "undoubtedly" was too strong a word. WDavid Lawrence-12/23/1996
554 David, I sure hope you're wrong when you say -- >... It can also represTulvio Durand-12/23/1996
553 9r, thanks for the cell/net info. I sort of suspected that the technology is nTulvio Durand-12/23/1996
552 Hitesh, the "smoking theory" seems credible, since January was USRDavid Lawrence-12/23/1996
551 David, the author of the PCWeek article you pointed us to said that there are hitesh puri-12/23/1996
550 U.S. Robotics Enhances Network Management For TOTALswitch LAN Switching Hub SKXpiderman-12/23/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News