SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5744 Nas... I agree pretty much with the comments about this quarter. Seems that tKevin Ose-10/21/1999
5743 Re: Investors will be kicking themselves for not buying here What about next wMichaelW-10/21/1999
5742 Art, each $1 change in IBM is 5 in the DJIA [from WSJ]. So about 75 points of tGottfried-10/21/1999
5741 >Investors will be kicking themselves for not buying here. Or buying too soAlex Raytselsky-10/21/1999
5740 Certainly Y2k was difficult to predict. IBM is now 33% off its highs from last art slott-10/21/1999
5739 art, Yes....and I think the UIS CEO should have said..."but please buy oubrad greene-10/21/1999
5738 Maine said IBM's difficulties in the upcoming quarters were concentrated inart slott-10/21/1999
5737 UIS profits are primarily from services. thats where most of the growth has beeart slott-10/21/1999
5736 Correction: The CFO said not to lower estimates for Qtr 2,3, and 4. He couldn&#art slott-10/21/1999
5735 Brad, I don't see it. >>I have read through both......and IBM's sart slott-10/21/1999
5734 Jim, tend to agree there is a bottom here somewhere before the end of the monthArrow Hd.-10/21/1999
5733 Michael, Boy, you were so smart. I now wish I had done the same thing. I shouldDorine Essey-10/21/1999
5732 Y2K is a software problem. You fix it by replacing old software. You do not fGreg R-10/21/1999
5731 200 mil over the est . S&P , they just want it cheap that's all. IBM (Hyperpy-10/21/1999
5730 I agree MichaelW, just my opinion, but it might be wise to sit back and wait fojjrocket-10/21/1999
5729 IBM is still into mainframes, something that's much less Y2K compliant thanMichaelW-10/21/1999
5728 IBM is blaming its poor result on Y2K, how ridiculous? Why MSFT is not affecteSmart Investor-10/21/1999
5727 "lie detectors" LOL... GREAT IDEA! Hooking up analysts to lie detectjjrocket-10/21/1999
5726 Dorine, your right in a way, but I have a bad feeling about next week, only my MichaelW-10/21/1999
5725 all of it...@136 thanks for your strong buy recommendation... <g>10K a day-10/21/1999
5724 I agree - this is a real opportunity for people with heart. Buy, buy, buy....TGuru Gus-10/21/1999
5723 Hi Michael, I have come to the conclusion that when these creeps like NILES spDorine Essey-10/21/1999
5722 Hear those bottom feeders? Gobble! Gobble! IBM could go lower, but it is oversJim Koch-10/21/1999
5721 Hi Dorine! Well, you are not alone in getting hammered. I, personally, look at Ray-10/21/1999
5720 Re: Dan Niles (BRS) is nailing IBM again on CNBC Maybe he's buying these sMichaelW-10/21/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News