Premisys Communication (PRMS) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Premisys Communication (PRMS)

An SI Board Since August 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1775	11	0	PRMS

Emcee: JakeStraw	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
575	ROK is the ticker symbol for Rockwell International. Rockwell and AT&T are	Terry Hedden	-	3/19/1997
574	Companies do not talk about restructuring unless they are in trouble. Insiders	Don Earl	-	3/19/1997
573	Terry, Pardon my ignorance, but who is ROK? Wayne	Wayners	-	3/19/1997
572	I have been reading alot of posts on prms, do you feel that it is a good buy no	thomas larkin	-	3/19/1997
571	TO ALL: I do not own this stock, but I spoke to ROK and they said "We Sho	Terry Hedden	-	3/18/1997
570	<<There will be inventory writedowns and other special charges forthcomin	Wayners	-	3/18/1997
569	Mark, It's good to hear that somebody is making money out of PRMS. :) Bel	Joshua Yoon	-	3/18/1997
568	Good to hear that you talked to Joyce. I ain't getting any phone calls back	Joshua Yoon	-	3/18/1997
567	That is one hell of a story. Its so contrived. I agree 100%. But whose faul	Fowler1	-	3/18/1997
566	Mark, I too liked your trade at 11, wished I would have been watching the tape	Roy S. Newman II	-	3/17/1997
565	To Steve and all: The cautionary language also mentions the possible loss of P	Don Earl	-	3/17/1997
564	Foolish may have been too harsh a word, after all, Mark did ok. Unless the com	Stan Walker	-	3/17/1997
563	What did you want them to do? The 10 Q was cautionary as was much of the talk	epicure	-	3/17/1997
562	I was in contact with PR numerous times in the two weeks prior to disater. I w	Steve Cislaw	-	3/17/1997
561	Hi Lorare; I'm not quite sure of your reason for requoting my post? I'	Mark Dodd	-	3/17/1997
560	Barry, thanks for the reference. I agree, you can short at any level. In fact	Turtle Pad	-	3/17/1997
559	Hi Stan; No, I don't take your comments the wrong way at all; investment s	Mark Dodd	-	3/17/1997
558	It is not foolish at all to short a stock at $11 that been as high as $60. The	Barry Hall	-	3/17/1997
557	"As for their shorting reasons, the only information I've been given i	Lorare	-	3/17/1997
556	Mark, I hope you don't take this the wrong way because I mean no disrespec	Stan Walker	-	3/17/1997
555	Which is the response I expected, Josh. Do you think any comment I make on he	Mark Dodd	-	3/17/1997
554	I talked with Joyce at IR today and she will be getting back to me on several q	epicure	-	3/17/1997
553	I think Mark want us to bring a class action suit, so that PRMS will suffer mor	Joshua Yoon	-	3/17/1997
552	Who are the shorts you have been talking to? Why do they expect more negative n	Peter Jones	-	3/17/1997
551	Book value for PRMS is $3.73 Tech Me Home	Tech Me Home	-	3/17/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):