SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Northrich Pacific Ventures NPA:V
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7431 20 0 NPA
Emcee:  Mike Campagna Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5756 Hi All , If you don`t think this was pump and dump look at the facts john mcknight-6/14/1997
5755 Northern Miner reports prices June 14th: Nickel,$7120-7125us/tonne,spot price(Jdave fenn-6/14/1997
5754 I see it as a positive result 5 of the 7 holes are positive and the geologists edward filipek-6/14/1997
5753 No Dave, If everyone or some folks on this thread think this is pump and dumpRonald P. Margraf Sr.-6/14/1997
5752 Hey Ron when we put this prop into perspective we have barely scratched the surdave herbert-6/14/1997
5751 Well Put.Ronald P. Margraf Sr.-6/14/1997
5750 Dave, Probably in bed where the rest of us should be. I'm a night owl pluRonald P. Margraf Sr.-6/14/1997
5749 HA, HA, HA, I love yea Dave, If you want to know how to get the condoms out wRonald P. Margraf Sr.-6/14/1997
5748 I understand, but they only hoped to find gold, they new the Ni and Co were theDave Atkinson-6/14/1997
5747 No Ron It's late, and I thought you said they were looking for gold. Oh welDave Atkinson-6/14/1997
5746 Dave, Contra. Go back to the very early post of this thread. Gold is what wasRonald P. Margraf Sr.-6/14/1997
5745 Ron Ron Ron i was not disputing the co potential just putting it into a ni persdave herbert-6/14/1997
5744 Morning Dave, Where did you come to that conclusion. That is not the way I reRonald P. Margraf Sr.-6/14/1997
5743 Dave or anyone if you talk to the co next week try to get them to send you the dave herbert-6/14/1997
5742 Dave, Your missing my point. Maybe the cobolt is the play and not the nickelRonald P. Margraf Sr.-6/14/1997
5741 The company was never looking for anything other than Ni and Co. The old mine Dave Atkinson-6/14/1997
5740 One other thought is hole 1-9 are what extended this play to 1100 to the south.Dave Atkinson-6/14/1997
5739 <TO ALL> <FOOD FOR THOUGHT> <NO CHARTS STUFFS> <JUST FOOD Ronald P. Margraf Sr.-6/14/1997
5738 Greetings Ron Agree with you on the cobalt .4% co =3.2% ni.From the assays itdave herbert-6/14/1997
5737 Greetings Gia saw this but was not going to post it glad you did as i missed thdave herbert-6/14/1997
5736 Top of the morning to you Dave, After reading the last 70 or so post, I was oRonald P. Margraf Sr.-6/14/1997
5735 Thanks again Dave.This is the site which summarises a lot of what you have postgianelda-6/14/1997
5734 dave, all For what it's worth, there's some interesting information abBW-6/14/1997
5733 Diamond Fields Resources Inc DFR TSE July 25, 1996 Exploration Results From Vdave herbert-6/14/1997
5732 DFR TSE April 11, 1996 Quarterly Exploration Results From Voisey's Bay Vdave herbert-6/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):