Silicon Investor - Legacy Interface Discussion (2004-2011)

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums
Silicon Investor - Legacy Interface Discussion (2004-2011)

An SI Board Since January 2004

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
6035	180	0

Emcee: SI Brad	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
5760	SI, to look into the prior post, go to Message 27356065 and click Next.	Sr K	-	5/5/2011
5759	I got the following message when trying to access BDBBR message no. 150623. It	Sweet Ol	-	5/5/2011
5758	<i>I'm guessing it has something to do with all these new redirect/rel	stevenallen	-	5/2/2011
5757	Time to escalate this: Message 27312626	S. maltophilia	-	4/16/2011
5756	I get Ford when I click on the the quarterly or annual reports button - using Go	B.K.Myers	-	4/16/2011
5755	That's what I figured, since we haven't heard about this until 4.0. I	S. maltophilia	-	4/15/2011
5754	I've got Firefox v 3.6.16 and it works fine for me. I get Nike, not Ford.	Jerry Held	-	4/15/2011
5753	I'm curious - what browser and version were you getting this with? Can someo	S. maltophilia	-	4/15/2011
5752	I tried it in IE and it works. Nice. Thanks :)	pief	-	4/15/2011
5751	I get it, too, in Mozilla (4.0), but if I try it in IE8, it goes to the Nike dat	S. maltophilia	-	4/15/2011
5750	I get the same thing that you get. Ford motor reports show when I click on Annua	B.K.Myers	-	4/14/2011
5749	It works for me.	Sr K	-	4/14/2011
5748	I have problem. When I am here si.advfn.com^NKE and want to look at Nike, Inc	pief	-	4/14/2011
5747	Actually it seems sometimes it does show as a link and sometimes it does not.	TimF	-	1/28/2011
5746	True but that's no longer necessary. https://xxx shows up as a link now.	TimF	1	1/15/2011
5745	Tim, I think if you simply remove the "s" from "https" then	B.K.Myers	-	1/15/2011
5744	Yes typically that's sufficient. I have no one on ignore.	TimF	-	1/15/2011
5743	I have a simple solution...to your perceived problem. Hit the "NEXT"	arno	3	1/15/2011
5742	I would not expect any changes anytime soon. Can't see Bob tinkering with S	Lahcim Leinad	-	1/14/2011
5741	That sounds good, though it could be a bit challenging to program in the system.	saveslivesbyday	-	1/14/2011
5740	I'd like something, that might be more complex to implement. The ability	TimF	-	1/14/2011
5739	I suggest an "extended ignore" feature, includes ingored poster and al	saveslivesbyday	-	1/13/2011
5738	Can a change be made so that https://xxxx in a post is recognized as a link?	TimF	-	1/12/2011
5737	Thanks! B	Bruce Robbins	-	1/12/2011
5736	IH Geek [Dave] Share Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:14:28 AM Re: stuffit p	scion	-	1/12/2011

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):