SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5760<i>"Jewel is a cool guy and stuck between a rock and a hard place<Solon-3/14/2003
5759Only if you are willing to define justice. I just read in the Wall Street JournThe Philosopher-3/14/2003
5758<i>Since I was talking about goals for the US, I assumed continued freedomThe Philosopher-3/14/2003
5757<i> I have no idea where you think we are, at this point...... </iThe Philosopher-3/14/2003
5756You can put justice on your list. <g> As I have ranted on about often enouLane3-3/14/2003
5755<i>You introduced the idea of "traitor", not I. I have no idea wLane3-3/14/2003
5754Jewel is a cool guy and stuck between a rock and a hard place. Like Mohammed AliIsh-3/14/2003
5753And, can we slip "justice" in there?one_less-3/14/2003
5752I didn't see him mention Israel at all. Did I miss that? And we simply disThe Philosopher-3/14/2003
5751<I>I want to muck around with the definitions. </I> Wouldn't yoLane3-3/14/2003
5750Excellent post. You also have to ask not just which American interest, but how The Philosopher-3/14/2003
5749<i>"Now having Jewel as a neighbor, I'd like that.</i>"Solon-3/14/2003
5748<<When a country (Iran) states publicly that it WILL convert the entire woIsh-3/14/2003
5747<i>"I stand by "peace and prosperity" as goals. If you wantone_less-3/14/2003
5746I thought what kholt said had merit and was fairly exemplified. It did not seem one_less-3/14/2003
5745I am following my heart, and spending quality time with my wife. Good evening, aNeocon-3/14/2003
5744It goes without saying that just because someone said something, it doesn't Neocon-3/14/2003
5743You introduced the idea of "traitor", not I. I have no idea what you tNeocon-3/14/2003
5742Good post but the answers are not complex: Pan-Arab Nationalism floated on the Solon-3/14/2003
5741If you strongly disagree, that is, have very little (if any) doubt, and think thNeocon-3/14/2003
5740The term "American Interests" is being bandied about on this thread inone_less-3/14/2003
5739I don't understand your saying that. Are you saying that anybody saying anyThe Philosopher-3/14/2003
5738<i>And how is he wrongheaded? Because he has a set of bias which obscure fLane3-3/14/2003
5737It has a great deal to with whether claiming that a group is supporting a policyThe Philosopher-3/14/2003
5736The choice of isolationism (which you have brought up before) is tempting but ulSolon-3/14/2003
5735Very insightful paragraph, even if somewhat brutal...Solon-3/14/2003
5734Naw, we were clarifying positions and expressing opinions. I am pretty familar Solon-3/14/2003
5733<i>I think people can differ the wisdom of war without either one being agLane3-3/14/2003
5732That doesn't interest me.Neocon-3/14/2003
5731But their saying it doesn't make it so. That's the problem.The Philosopher-3/14/2003
5730And how is he wrongheaded? Because he has a set of bias which obscure for him thNeocon-3/14/2003
5729I don't mean absolute, but I think Neo's argument required absolute. I The Philosopher-3/14/2003
5728<i>If you do not believe me, ask any strong opponent of the war if it is aLane3-3/14/2003
5727<i>you have to argue that Bush is acting contrary to American interests inLane3-3/14/2003
5726doesn't have much to do with anything, but okie dokie.....Neocon-3/14/2003
5725I was discussing the opinion of those against the war, which is that it is againNeocon-3/14/2003
5724I have been discussing the opinion of those against the war about the activitiesNeocon-3/14/2003
5723Okay. But if "peace and prosperity" are stand-alone American interestThe Philosopher-3/14/2003
5722If by "absolute" you mean "extreme," then I take your point.Lane3-3/14/2003
5721I stand by "peace and prosperity" as goals. If you want to muck aroundLane3-3/14/2003
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News