SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Stochastics
An SI Board Since January 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
927 22 0
Emcee:  Roger Hess Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
577 CYCH missed earnings by about $.05 and revenues were down 25 % from last quartejjs_ynot-5/12/1998
576 I'm not sure what happened with Cyberchicken. It did give a sell signal onWayners-5/12/1998
575 Well CYCH certainly gave you the downside break. Dave jjs_ynot-5/12/1998
574 Last Stock Update 5/12/98 close. Updated NASDAQ thru XCIT. This thread analyzesWayners-5/12/1998
573 Perfect! Anything you say, Wayne. You're the man. :) Seriously--thanks Mike Hagerty-5/12/1998
572 After going down the list, the following are the stocks that MUST be DELETED ifWayners-5/11/1998
571 I think that is a great idea Wayne. We were already calibrated to a number of ijjs_ynot-5/11/1998
570 Another option is to go to the old list and delete the stuff that isn't curWayners-5/11/1998
569 Here is my two cents' worth on the stock list. First, I request adding INTCCathedra-5/11/1998
568 To Wayne and all: Since Wayne posted his scan sometime back, perhaps someone wCatLady-5/11/1998
567 I'm really talking about following a list like the following. Each is currWayners-5/11/1998
566 The list was constant and only included stocks that people of the thread requesWayners-5/11/1998
565 I occasionally look at a chart of IBM, but its volatility is too low for it to Wayners-5/11/1998
564 I would only consider doing it on stocks that I consider tradeable--i.e. decentWayners-5/11/1998
563 Any chance you'd consider continuing this if a few hundred people wrote andMike Hagerty-5/11/1998
562 <i>Wayne--THNKS !</i> You mean THNK....<g> Looks like itJeff Jordan-5/10/1998
561 Hello Folks, I use TS 4.0 and would not mind participating. Jeff... Backfill-5/9/1998
560 Mike, Wayne, or anyone else interested: I got too busy this week to keep up thNW_Trader-5/8/1998
559 It took 45 to 50 minutes. The more comments the longer. Wayners-5/7/1998
558 Wayne--THNKS ! Sammy sammy levy-5/7/1998
557 Thanks Dave and Wayne for the pointer. Wayne, can you tell me approximately hoMike Hagerty-5/6/1998
556 See post #500 to see where the technical indicator/system formulas are. Its noWayners-5/6/1998
555 You might take a look at post 500 as a point of reference. jjs_ynot-5/5/1998
554 I'll second that...we appreciate all of the help you have given. Thanks agaJason Loren Bauer-5/5/1998
553 Hey Wayne, Tahnks for all you've done in the past. I can imagine it does gAugustWest-5/5/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News