SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qwest Communications (Q) (formerly QWST)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6846 129 0 Q
Emcee:  Capitalizer Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5771 The plot thickens... Alert: U S West Says Remains Committed to Qwest Merger (mNick-3/2/2000
5770 Not aimed at you, specifically... With Q at $60, and Q's offer standing atMichael Grosz-3/2/2000
5769 If the Q deal doesn't happen then it's likely to drop back to $50-51, IBig Bucks-3/2/2000
5768 Awesome movement the last few days. I thought that Q was undervalued before, Thomas Walker-3/2/2000
5767dailynews.yahoo.comBig Bucks-3/2/2000
5766 Q/USW halted imbalance due to Bloombomb story DT in talks with GLBX.samoyed-3/2/2000
5765 Nick, Given that today's high has been $69 and change...perhaps it was trumfgrep-3/2/2000
5764 Deal rumors swirl around SBC, BellSouth, Qwest By Corey Grice Staff Writer, CNJohn T. Hardee-3/2/2000
5763 I think that $65B is a good number. LoFSecularBull-3/2/2000
5762 Samoyed, Q is all over the place. Lost all of it's gains, now up 4 again. Nick-3/2/2000
5761 Just some quick speculation. If Q is sold/valued at $65B that equals about $86.Big Bucks-3/2/2000
5760 I take that back. We're moving up again. LoFSecularBull-3/2/2000
5759 We're drifting lower without much support. Too much profit taking, I guessSecularBull-3/2/2000
5758 Hey Nick, have you been to the bank yet? Price down, but could see turnaround ssamoyed-3/2/2000
5757 N, fwiw, if Joe N. has anything to do with it, I feel we could see a nice premisamoyed-3/2/2000
5756 Earlier bids were no doubt shorts attempting to scare a few out, but price now samoyed-3/2/2000
5755 Opened at ~$64.SecularBull-3/2/2000
5754 Samoyed, Let's say we close today @ $65, how much higher do you think DT&#Nick-3/2/2000
5753 Q bid 50, ask 66. Huge order imbalance.samoyed-3/2/2000
5752 I show bid 52, ask 63. õsamoyed-3/2/2000
5751 From what Faber just said, USW not at a premium, maybe we will get ours if dealsamoyed-3/2/2000
5750 Ask now @ 67. Huge imbalances as this thing is all over the place. NevertheleNick-3/2/2000
5749 Alert: NYSE Indication Last 59 3/16 Bid 62 Ask 65 (NYSE:Q) NNick-3/2/2000
5748 I got that number off of E*Trade...is it not true? NNick-3/2/2000
5747 Where do you see that we are at 64 1/2 (+11%). I see no such thing. JGmfgrep-3/2/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News