SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Pangea Goldfields T.PGD
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1178 7 0 PGD
Emcee:  Larry Voyer Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
578 Well of course that is nonsense - on two counts - first no major producer wantsEnigma-12/13/1999
577 Not hardly. There's nothing cheap or careless about it. I don't trust BTerry Swift-12/13/1999
576 What possible influence do you think Barrick had on the decision to pull the fiEnigma-12/12/1999
575 That would not surprise me in the least. I regard Barrick as more of a predatorTerry Swift-12/12/1999
574 "what in hell is really going on here"? Perhaps the mixed signals aPtaskmaster-12/11/1999
573 I agree. First, they need an additional $11.5 million to complete projects and Terry Swift-12/11/1999
572 Change in price of gold over two weeks cited as a reason to cancel financing! Syncrude-12/10/1999
571 Pangea withdraws proposed financing Pakidl-12/10/1999
570 MDN will have to come up with their 30%, according to the JV agreement, or loseTerry Swift-12/3/1999
569 I think that is the reality for all juniors in this situation - to make as muchEnigma-12/3/1999
568 Dear Friend Terry-we went at this idea a few weeks back- we disagree! from whatsalva-12/3/1999
567 salva: "clear out JV partners"??? You're assuming Pangea wants tTerry Swift-12/2/1999
566 Yes agree- bidding war is probably much closer than we think - understand tru bsalva-12/2/1999
565 This makes alot of sense to me. It would in fact explain why PGD granted the ritimbouctou-12/2/1999
564 Salva - I'm not sure about that - majors don't usually want a minority Enigma-12/2/1999
563 D, down here in flda for a little vacation and reading all posts with my littlesalva-12/2/1999
562 Interesting situation? We have this offering in registration - the price is $4Enigma-12/1/1999
561 financing ... good leverage if pangea ,succeeded in having money from BAjack BROSS-12/1/1999
560 Terry, PGD will be in big trouble within 1-2 years if they do not raise cash riWade-12/1/1999
559 That's what I think - it's a footrace in a way. All of the action mustEnigma-11/30/1999
558 I think it will be more difficult to hold onto the company if somebody wants thTerry Swift-11/30/1999
557 It is of course very hard for juniors to hold onto 100% of properties - so thisEnigma-11/30/1999
556 DD: I agree. PGD has no intention of selling Tulawaka. If somebody wants it, tTerry Swift-11/30/1999
555 I don't think they are ever likely to sell any properties - perhaps marginaEnigma-11/30/1999
554 thanks DD IF A MAJOR DOESN'Tbid on tulawaka soon, it looks like PGD jack BROSS-11/30/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News