SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Low Price/Cash Ratio Value Stocks
An SI Board Since September 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1931 167 0
Emcee:  Q. Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
581SEEC gets mention in Forbes and stock is up today while most stocks down. Good stock leader-11/11/2002
580yea and it's falling right back below $1 it seemsstock leader-11/10/2002
579SEEC I like the buyback aspect, although I was expecting to see more of an impaMCsweet-11/7/2002
578GEMS made a big move today on new customer announcement . biz.yahoo.com Will seeStefan-11/6/2002
577SEEC has done ok to since my call at .70... However that shutters in comparisonstock leader-11/6/2002
576I still recommend ALPH and VNWI, despite my overall losses in these. They are sMCsweet-11/6/2002
575Most below cash stocks have popping significantly in past couple days so cautiostock leader-11/5/2002
574I bought some MCKC (not much) at much lower values. I'm waiting for more neMCsweet-11/5/2002
573GEMS doesn't seem to have that much downside. But liabilities total $60 milstock leader-11/5/2002
572MCKC has been creeping up already from .72 ....so right now it's up 63% fromstock leader-11/4/2002
571Any opinions on GEMS? No debt and over $100mil in cash. They added more cash in Stefan-11/4/2002
570How about MCKC. Seems to have over $2 in cash. Lowering cash burn with cost cuThomas Fletcher-11/4/2002
569they usually do work out well. a major call of mine this year was INSP at .42 astock leader-11/4/2002
568Stock leader, if you wouldn't buy the best of that bunch of 23, what cash-riPaul Senior-11/4/2002
567RCOM probably the best of the bunch although i personally would not buy it. RCOstock leader-11/3/2002
566CMRC is losing a boatload of cash every qtr plus CMRC has massive restructuring stock leader-11/3/2002
565CMRC is worthless. Qtrly cash loss rate is $40 mill... so at end of year CMRC wstock leader-11/3/2002
564There are a lot more than that AFOP,SEEC blah blah etc etcstock leader-11/3/2002
563Hi Julius, if the cash CMRC has on hand is expected to drop from 6.46 to 2.31, tChrisJP-11/3/2002
562CMRC is a low price/cash ratio stock. The question is on the <b>value</Julius Wong-11/3/2002
561<i> Companies whose shares are selling below the net cash on their balanceChrisJP-11/3/2002
560Here is a listing of companies trading a net of cash assets (supposedly) from NoDavid-11/2/2002
559Barron's MONDAY, NOVEMBER 04, 2002 Companies whose shares are selling belowJulius Wong-11/2/2002
558Julius: can you provide the date of the article. I am a Wall Street Journal subDavid-11/2/2002
557Companies whose shares are selling below the net cash on their balance sheets. Julius Wong-11/2/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):