SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Iomega - A Civil Discussion
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1908 3 0 IOM
Emcee:  Trakker Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
583 Quite recently the Motley Fool reprinted a long article on the Iomega saga. It Francis Muir-4/2/1997
582 Great! I'll help. Maybe we could communicate on this by email. Also, might Gottfried-4/1/1997
581 Re: FAQ gig Gottfried - I *should* have more time available to me after Wednejwk-4/1/1997
580 Jack, will you, please start the FAQ board? It will need a few guide lines, othGottfried-4/1/1997
579 Re: FAQ thing - Guys, thanks for the positive response to the idea. I'mjwk-4/1/1997
578 << ...a proposal to authorize 250m(?) more shares. >> of course apFrancis Muir-4/1/1997
577 RE: authorizing more shares Just got my ballot from Iomega, including a proposEve Edelson-4/1/1997
576 RE: Redesigned Iomega Web Site iomega.com investor stuff iomega.com site loTrakker-4/1/1997
575 RE: Market Data Dataquest Says <b>Removable Disk Drive Market Continues Trakker-4/1/1997
574 Francis, maybe he would agree to having an area where WE post links to SI postsGottfried-4/1/1997
573 It seems to me that this FAQ business could best be done by expanding Ken MarcuFrancis Muir-4/1/1997
572 Jack, a good idea. And we don't have to restrict it to facts, but could incGottfried-4/1/1997
571 Re: IOM FAQ site ? - Just thinking out loud here . . . I know there are severjwk-4/1/1997
570 Wally, yes - you remove the existing floppy 1.44 MB drive by removing the PC coGottfried-3/31/1997
569 Scott, JY said >>The more I think about it the more excited I get. I see Gottfried-3/31/1997
568 Gottfried - forgot to thank you for your info - practically though you still hawally hieslmair-3/31/1997
567 Re: licensee > or did you mean "NEC as the second drive manufacturing steve goff-3/31/1997
566 Kent, you asked >does IOM make any money off of NEC producing and selling drsteve goff-3/31/1997
565 Herb; If you are going to print that part of JunkYards commentary I think you Scott Moody-3/31/1997
564 Re: Zip disk future as stated by "Fool Junk Yard71" >>>>Herb Fuller-3/31/1997
563 Here's a dumb question but does IOM make any money off of NEC producing andKent Bragg-3/31/1997
562 >>Intel Corp., Microsoft Corp.and Compaq Computer Corp. this week will anCogito-3/31/1997
561 RE: Device Bay Most likely a non-event meaning the zip, jaz, syjet and ls-120 Trakker-3/31/1997
560 Gene, Epson (and someone else whose name escapes me) was not a licensee, but a Cameron Dorey-3/31/1997
559 <<NEC as the second one besides Iomega to produce zips sounds like sales Gene Weisskopf-3/31/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News