SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qwest Communications (Q) (formerly QWST)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6846 129 0 Q
Emcee:  Capitalizer Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5846 Hmmmm--a 100B$ bid by DT If the market cap is 40.252B$ now, that is $134/shareCurtis E. Bemis-3/9/2000
5845 On the other hand: Deutsche Telekom Bids $100 Bln for Qwest, U S West (UpdScotsman-3/9/2000
5844 March 8, 2000 05:59 PM (Adds byline, stock prices, details throughout, stands samoyed-3/8/2000
5843 Very interesting article! I firmly believe in Nacchio's ability to negotiamfgrep-3/8/2000
5842 Maybe it ain't dead yet. dailynews.yahoo.com Wednesday March 8 3:08 PM ET Srexley-3/8/2000
5841 Alert: NYSE Indication Last 56 1/16 Bid 47 Ask 50 (NYSE:Q) This stinks!!! NNick-3/8/2000
5840 Alert: NYSE Indication Last 56 1/16 Bid 53 Ask 56 (NYSE:Q)Nick-3/8/2000
5839 Yes...perhaps I will be able to buy my position back a little cheaper today. mfgrep-3/8/2000
5838 Nick, thanks for the article, had not seen that one. Today may be interesting. samoyed-3/8/2000
5837 That was a nice find Scotsman, thanks. I think that's the message our Q stSJS-3/8/2000
5836 Here is a tidbit NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Scared by Qwest Communications InternaScotsman-3/8/2000
5835 Good point Samoyed. I guess this below article was pretty obvious... NonethelNick-3/7/2000
5834 Nick, <<stuck with a USWest stock>> very good point, as USW on its samoyed-3/7/2000
5833 Just because the reason you mentioned. Yes the deal does look 80%, but if the Nick-3/7/2000
5832 Thanks. <eom>Dinesh-3/7/2000
5831 Dinesh, I am sorry, but the play is NOT good. The long put side was fine for SJS-3/7/2000
5830 SJS The person was concerned about losing ground, hence the put. And I did menDinesh-3/7/2000
5829 If I wanted to own Qwest, why wouldn't I buy USW at a discount. I know the GS_Wall Street-3/7/2000
5828 Frank, Hi there. I am also long this stock, and since this is very news drivenSJS-3/7/2000
5827 What just happen to USW down over 5 points?GS_Wall Street-3/7/2000
5826 SJS - What do you think the right play is now if you are long this stock? - FFrank Wechsler-3/7/2000
5825 That's really NOT good advice, sorry. That's a double short position. SJS-3/7/2000
5824 Moving back into buying range ($47.50-$52.50, IMHO)! LoFSecularBull-3/7/2000
5823 The Denver Post has written extensively about Q/USW this week. Not surprising beach3-3/7/2000
5822 Frank Considered writing Apr60 calls and buying Apr60 puts ? It offers you somDinesh-3/6/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):