SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
What Number Am I Thinking Of?
An SI Board Since August 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
710 9 0
Emcee:  Quahog Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
585Tell you what.... You tell me the number, then I'll do the math. :)Quahog7/29/2003
584having just got here, I'll let you know what it is. Just do a simple thing.Green Receipt7/29/2003
583true, but not right. gggQuahog7/26/2003
582what are you lonely? here i'll guess a number 916mr.mark2/5/2003
581For the record, the number remains a mystery to all but me. Thanks for trying oQuahog2/5/2003
580Guess I should update this soon.Quahog7/26/2002
579Some numbers are more important than others so they get saved to an array. SincMechanicalMethod5/2/2002
578<i>...It could be a huge contribution to the science of math?</i> IPMS Witch5/2/2002
5771.414 * SQRT(2) + 2;MechanicalMethod5/2/2002
576You might have discovered something there. It could be a huge contribution to tMechanicalMethod5/2/2002
575The digits repeat... 2.236 0679380239984756532298776655890867224837326211103837PMS Witch5/2/2002
574The square root of 5 is not the correct answer.Quahog4/8/2002
573that's what happens when you pose a compound question<g> yes yesmph4/7/2002
572Yes no or Yes yes? 2.236067938023998475653229877665589086722483732621110383754MechanicalMethod4/7/2002
571yes:-)mph4/7/2002
570Are you gambling or psychic? 600 - 30;MechanicalMethod4/7/2002
5691.732MechanicalMethod4/7/2002
568<i>Decimals?</i> Yes they're quite sufficient for flushing the MechanicalMethod4/7/2002
567238 or 567, as per this post number<g>mph4/7/2002
566Decimals? 3.14159265CatLady4/7/2002
565<i>I am sorry to report that 618 is not the number I was thinking of. <MechanicalMethod4/7/2002
564<i>I am sorry to report that 618 is not the number I was thinking of. <MechanicalMethod4/7/2002
563<i>I am sorry to report that 618 is not the number I was thinking of. <MechanicalMethod4/7/2002
562<i>I am sorry to report that 618 is not the number I was thinking of. <MechanicalMethod4/7/2002
561<i>I am sorry to report that 618 is not the number I was thinking of. <MechanicalMethod4/7/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News