SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Pharmos (PARS)
An SI Board Since October 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1386 42 0 PARS
Emcee:  Dr. John M. de Castro Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
586 David, I believe that HU-211 is a potentially a very lucrative product. I donFilbert-3/2/1999
585 Moral of the story: Don't buy penny stocks.johnny weissman-3/2/1999
584 Yes, we essentially agree... however, as to the arbitrage: <I still think LLCF-3/2/1999
583 David, I agree that CC has a lot to do with PARS low price. I know exactly whaOmer Shvili-3/2/1999
582 David I agree with you in regards to CC and its effect. They also got anti dilyosi s-3/1/1999
581 Re: The risk factors - my understanding is that the only reason that IMGN was hawkshaw27-3/1/1999
580 To: Omer Shvili From: David A. Kincade LLCF-3/1/1999
579 <...but the consensus among the more knowledgeable biotech investors I'vLLCF-3/1/1999
578 David, I agree with you that PARS is undervalued. However, your numbers are waOmer Shvili-3/1/1999
577 Richard, I agree with almost everything you said. I agree that there aren'Omer Shvili-3/1/1999
576 Re: Royalty rates...the norm these days seems to be for partnering companies thawkshaw27-3/1/1999
575 Pars Management is not going to change its view of the world. They think that RDavid Israel-Rosen-2/28/1999
574 Pars is not in the poor house and $1 Billion drugs are not dime a dozen. WhereDavid Israel-Rosen-2/28/1999
573 PARS--- If you play afraid to lose rather than playing to win, you will lose. Ron-2/28/1999
572 DAVID-----I AGAIN AGREE 100%! PR! Where is it? Gradual, positive press releasRon-2/28/1999
571 David... <PARS share at 30%...> ??? In this day and age of Big-Pharma hawkshaw27-2/28/1999
570 "Against most opinions, HU-211 is not a blockbuster drug. A blockbuster yosi s-2/28/1999
569 <CC will have to report to SEC if they have kept their shares. yet no such fLLCF-2/28/1999
568 LET's get back to earth: having done my due diligence in advance of my mulDavid Israel-Rosen-2/28/1999
567 Richard: Net Present Value Should determine current Price. The Net Present VaDavid Israel-Rosen-2/28/1999
566 Perhaps I am getting proved wrong, but I do not share the common explanation foRichard Huth-2/28/1999
565 Yosi- I don't think you're interpretation is correct, unless I misunderTony van Werkhooven-2/28/1999
564 At present CC can convert at 10% discount to the price 180 days after placeyosi s-2/28/1999
563 <David- In a recent prior post I mentioned that PARS IR had indicated 1500 PLLCF-2/27/1999
562 David- In a recent prior post I mentioned that PARS IR had indicated 1500 Pref.Tony van Werkhooven-2/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):