SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
RADIUS RISES FROM THE ASHES (DODV)
An SI Board Since September 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1438 9 0 DODV
Emcee:  christopher d licata Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
588 Thanks Steve!!username-12/24/1997
587 Pete, You misread, I sold half for more than a 100% gain. I did however buy inSean Reilly-12/24/1997
586 Don Crabb's latest "Mac Manager" column in MacWeek: "GettingSteve Herzog-12/24/1997
585 SG, We were talking about Sean's position, (see the prior). What do you knusername-12/24/1997
584 Slow down guys. A few speculative comments have taken on the force of reality.SHGLaw-12/24/1997
583 sold half for a 32nd gain? yow! I'll have to check out those other deals.username-12/24/1997
582 Just an amateur's speculation on Mitsubishi's motivation for trading RDCarl T Hammerdorfer-12/23/1997
581 Found this via the Quicken.com site: Tuesday, December 23, 1997 09:18 PM Steve Herzog-12/23/1997
580 Pete, If I answer that question I am afraid you might not want to speak with mSean Reilly-12/23/1997
579 Sean, I am way more interested in the new products than why that seller sold. username-12/23/1997
578 I kinda want to find out if it is true or not. One time a broker told me somethusername-12/23/1997
577 Pete & Martin, I agree, especially if it was one of the debtors that have Sean Reilly-12/23/1997
576 Mitsub. buy : Good or bad? I think no matter how you slice it, there is a net Martin Olsen-12/23/1997
575 I might be able to find out tomorrow. Remember that for every transaction theusername-12/23/1997
574 To All, Does anyone know where these shares came from ? It is quite obvious thSean Reilly-12/23/1997
573 correct. this is the Dec. 11th filing. If MITS did buy back in, they make a niusername-12/23/1997
572 they did sell those shares.username-12/23/1997
571 Thanks! This is cool. SI is cool. I should have done this a long time ago. Areusername-12/23/1997
570 thanks. looks like it may come down a bit tomorrow and I can get more.username-12/23/1997
569 Martin, I don't think that this should be a very bullish sign if indeed MJ.S.-12/23/1997
568 Is this new info from Radius or old info? See post 498, where Reason227 refersMartin Olsen-12/23/1997
567 Only that this story contradicts my information from RDUS that Mitsubishi had SGreg Thomas-12/23/1997
566 Now the puzzling thing is, when did the news 'hit the street' and why dMartin Olsen-12/23/1997
565 i never thought that ;-). hmmm, they must have got it cheap.Greg Thomas-12/23/1997
564 so there you have it. Mitsubishi bought back in. They WANT to own a piece of SHGLaw-12/23/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):