SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Commerce One Inc - (CMRC)
An SI Board Since June 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1938 71 0 CMRC
Emcee:  Mohan Marette Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
588 A little market volatility has no influence on insiders decision to sell sharesstockpimp-1/7/2000
587 These last few days, with the market down, CMRC had been holding steady and actPedro Joaristi-1/7/2000
586 Commerce One shareholders file to sell stock By Amanda Tyler , CBS MarketWatchthecow-1/7/2000
585 ARBA and NASDAQ sharply up, CMRC down! Are insiders still selling or does someoPedro Joaristi-1/7/2000
584 Why CMRC is weak today ? Too much selling from these guys. cbs.marketwatch.coLao Ou-1/7/2000
583 He said nothing new at this time... Mentioned GM and the Tradexchange, and acknDick W-1/7/2000
582 Well, what did he say....the stock does'nt seem to like it. :) D.Dalin-1/7/2000
581 Mark Hoffman on CNBC - Interview ... in a few minutes. Time now: 12:45 pm EST Dick W-1/7/2000
580 Well it looks like it was a little healthy correction on account of a generous Mohan Marette-1/7/2000
579 David, I agree that on a fundamental basis, the valuation of B2B are absurd. HWilliam Partmann-1/7/2000
578 Part II of the CNBC B2B article. <b>B2B E-Commerce Stocks to Watch</bBrian Malloy-1/6/2000
577 wow.I better put a couple pots of coffee on.thanks. johnsto1-1/6/2000
576 The must read article at I1. may have part of what you are looking for. MessageBrian Malloy-1/6/2000
575 OK. I was wrong. It was $993. There is a tendency in my poor pea-brain to rejDavid W. Taylor-1/6/2000
574 David, not the quibble but this deflating blimp hit 331 post split, which is ofErick444-1/6/2000
573 You are not asking the right question. The question should be "Why did thDavid W. Taylor-1/6/2000
572 TENNET: thanks for >insidertrading< site, compare CMRC owned 18% by instbreathe-1/6/2000
571 sam.The tradeXchange?I've been trying to come up with some fundamental infojohnsto1-1/6/2000
570 Look at the prices of cmrc's competitors by clicking on the link for industthecow-1/6/2000
569 I don't see any reasons other than weak market conditions over at NASDAQ.&lMohan Marette-1/6/2000
568 Forgive me if this is a stupid question, as I have limited market experience, bGpeckry-1/6/2000
567 My take is that GM is pushing TradeXchange to all its Japanese partners. Obviosam-1/6/2000
566 My take on Toyota is that Toyota may decide not to join TradeExchange. This is ltbullish-1/6/2000
565 Nice link. Thanks,Brian Malloy-1/6/2000
564 Actually it's news to me. fwiw Very, very good news -- as u might imaginesam-1/6/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News