SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6710 8 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5885I think the Electors just have to vote on the 18th. They don't need to sendIlaine-12/12/2000
5884CB--While it is pretty much a "moot" point now, is there anything in yTraderGreg-12/12/2000
5883<<Gore should, as he should have much earlier, concede. >> After loTraderGreg-12/12/2000
5882No problem. I think the stay over the weekend was essentially the decision, barTraderGreg-12/12/2000
5881Floridas Electors are approved for Bush, this is probably the most important stetekmon-12/12/2000
5880Yeah, that's the real problem here - Florida didn't have tight election Valley Girl-12/12/2000
5879Valley, I'm counting on the SC to rule that "voter intent" is inschomolungma-12/12/2000
5878I apologise. My sense of humour is a bit wicked. I'm sure not gloating, siValley Girl-12/12/2000
5877Thursday.Bill-12/12/2000
5876Remember "The Agony and the Ecstasy"? When I'm finished!chomolungma-12/12/2000
5875Forget trying to predict WHAT the Court will do. Anybody want to try to predictThe Philosopher-12/12/2000
5874<<I saw that Maryland is going to have a review of the Federal election crTraderGreg-12/12/2000
5873Actually, your side needs to do that. What I've noticed is there's stilTraderGreg-12/12/2000
5872Ashcroft was asked not to challenge that by the MRP. They are working to recaptuCarolyn-12/12/2000
5871<<12/12/00 1:20 p.m. 5-4 Standard Illegitimate Supreme Court decisions. BCYBERKEN-12/12/2000
5870I'm not pissed anymore:) The Naz and many stocks have higher bottoms and soOral Roberts-12/12/2000
5869<i>Why is it so difficult for the Democrats to understand that selective cjttmab-12/12/2000
5868One given is that you need to have a president. Would you rather have one this wCYBERKEN-12/12/2000
5867<i>. I am just so pissed off by all of this that I probably don't evenjttmab-12/12/2000
5866What about the credibility of both the court and the election result with the AmValley Girl-12/12/2000
5865It was said in jest...lighten up! (Gore's come back from the dead more timeValley Girl-12/12/2000
5864<<Someone in Missouri should challenge this unconstitutional stealing of aCYBERKEN-12/12/2000
5863<i>I am civil with those who are civil. Otherwise, I respond in like kind.The Philosopher-12/12/2000
5862Of course, YOU would find nothing assinine about the post to which I was respondTraderGreg-12/12/2000
5861Since we are correcting all the election malfunctions in this country on this tmoosebeary-12/12/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):