SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic
An SI Board Since June 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1141 14 0
Emcee:  jjayxxxx Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
591Rink, I have one advice to lessen the time burden of moderating. Don't getJoe NYC-1/17/2007
590Rink, it futile to argue against Ephudian Logic. His logic can't be defeatedAli Chen-1/17/2007
589Rink, you had to get in your last cheap shot didn't you. I tell you what. YElmer Phud-1/17/2007
588Elmer, Manipulating crap! Probably should have done so sooner but I'm going Rink-1/17/2007
587Rink, you are simply being abusive here. I have not called you stupid or a liar Elmer Phud-1/17/2007
586Elmer, same lie again!! The reason was that you posted 100% OT <u>on top oRink-1/17/2007
585Pete, re: <i>You didn't even give a warning. Some of yours are off topRink-1/17/2007
584Elmer, re: <i>but it's certainly reasonable for me to read it that wayRink-1/17/2007
583Muzosi <i>as far as i understand you're upset that rink's initialElmer Phud-1/17/2007
582as far as i understand you're upset that rink's initial explanation of jmuzosi-1/17/2007
581muzosi <i>i have a similar response to some of your posts; for example thElmer Phud-1/17/2007
580<i>To Rink: That means you are becoming mentally unstable. Unstable does nmuzosi-1/17/2007
579I think Rink is losing it. To Rink: That means you are becoming mentally unstaElmer Phud-1/17/2007
578Rink Stop the nonsense will you. You clearly posted this: <i>Here's Elmer Phud-1/17/2007
577Dear Rink: I protest this strongly! I was just replying to a message. You didpgerassi-1/17/2007
576That's utter crap. You're full of that recently on this thread (see #575Rink-1/17/2007
575Bull. REPEAT: _______ You were not suspended at all for not providing prove. YoRink-1/17/2007
574Suspension period starts the moment someone is suspended. Regards, RinkRink-1/17/2007
573Elmer, tx for the direct request. So two days for you too. I'm not reading aRink-1/17/2007
572Rink - Be consistent now. I went over the limit yesterday and "turned myseElmer Phud-1/17/2007
571I think it starts when you are banned?FJB-1/17/2007
570Rink <i>You are insulting me. Twice now in as many days (see 2,3 above). Elmer Phud-1/17/2007
569 Re people turning themselves in - Does the two days (or whatever the suspenTimF-1/17/2007
568Turning myself in for speeding yesterday. I think ephud went over too.FJB-1/17/2007
567Joe, two days (speed limit). Thanks for reporting it yourself. George, Pete, BoRink-1/17/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News