SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Beauty and the Banned
An SI Board Since December 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
691 8 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
591If trash like you had anything, you'd have a summons in your hands, little bLazarus_Long-8/18/2005
590Mexico? Did you mention Mexico? Been all through that country. Many times. YeLazarus_Long-8/18/2005
589Typical stupidity from fishstick.Lazarus_Long-8/18/2005
588Gimme a break, dunderhead. You ban anyone who argues against you simply becauseLazarus_Long-8/18/2005
587Most people are either too impressed with themselves or too down on themselves.Peter Dierks-8/18/2005
586That is a TOU violation and you should have complained. He would have received aPeter Dierks-8/18/2005
585Well - maybe someday, if you are without healthcare insurance, or know people thtsigprofit-8/17/2005
584Europe and Canada have socialized health care with the rationing and long waitinBrumar89-8/17/2005
583While you are laughing at me, the rest of us are laughing at you. Why don'tPeter Dierks-8/17/2005
582Universal health care - not socialized medicine. You know - all of the countriestsigprofit-8/16/2005
581just laughing at you Dierks....tsigprofit-8/16/2005
580I was banned from that thread for the same reason - I posted against socializingBrumar89-8/16/2005
579He is a little too impressed with himself, imo.redfish-8/16/2005
578You wish you were worth that much effort. You were banned from the view from thePeter Dierks-8/16/2005
577It is good that you can laugh with the rest of the posters at yourself.Peter Dierks-8/16/2005
576The public waits to know - but - only the SHADOW knows lol Why don't you stsigprofit-8/16/2005
575LOLtsigprofit-8/16/2005
574Thank you for your efforts. It appears that tsiprofit will not divulge why I wasPeter Dierks-8/16/2005
573LOL That was from days ago after you failed to respond to a polite request for Peter Dierks-8/16/2005
572You're quite welcome.tsigprofit-8/16/2005
571<i>"Asked and answered."</i> Thank you.one_less-8/16/2005
570Asked and answered. See, he goes to namecalling because he has nothing else to stsigprofit-8/16/2005
569don't flatter yourself gem/roughcut. You weren't singled out for that.tsigprofit-8/16/2005
568Dierks - this is why you are banned - for namecalling just like this. YOU are thtsigprofit-8/16/2005
567Would you mind terribly providing us with an explanation for Peter's banningone_less-8/16/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News