Qwest Communications (Q) (formerly QWST)

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Qwest Communications (Q) (formerly QWST)

An SI Board Since June 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
6846	129	0	Q

Emcee: Capitalizer	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
5921	If the deal closes early in Q3, that seems to be pretty much in line with recen	Red Heeler	-	3/12/2000
5920	The most contentious State approval appears to be Minnesota. In the CC playback	Curtis E. Bemis	-	3/12/2000
5919	FCC approves merger - state approval soon to follow I bet. FCC Approves U S	Red Heeler	-	3/11/2000
5918	ALGX market cap is $10 Billion........1/10 of last offer for Q/US West.	KAF	-	3/11/2000
5917	Howard, rumor or fact? Link to story? Source? õ	samoyed	-	3/11/2000
5916	Jason/mfgrep, I sold out late Fri and am now waiting for pullback due to curren	samoyed	-	3/11/2000
5915	ALGX to be taken over by Q? Q has been in meetings with ALGX management...is t	Howard Bennett	-	3/11/2000
5914	Unfortunately, as far as takeovers of Q go, the real problem is the timing. Q i	Scotsman	-	3/11/2000
5913	Scotsman - Absolutely right. Further the Q boys must have worked through the	limtex	-	3/11/2000
5912	We are all beginning to witness the first Nacchio blemish. I was almost floored	mfgrep	-	3/11/2000
5911	Qwest CEO: US West actions "bizarre" By John Borland Staff Writer, C	samoyed	-	3/11/2000
5910	I fail to understand why everyone focuses on Nacchio, including that idiotic ar	Scotsman	-	3/10/2000
5909	RayC: Good find, I use the street to, but not real consistent, guess I need to	samoyed	-	3/10/2000
5908	Can anyone make a case why Nacchio should NOT be fired? He is out of his leagu	IndioBlues	-	3/10/2000
5907	A replay of the CC that happened at 3:30EST. I have not listened myself, yet,	Curtis E. Bemis	-	3/10/2000
5906	You guys - According to the Form S-4 (Amendment #2) filed with the SEC Septembe	Harry J.	-	3/10/2000
5905	The following is an article from The Street.com assessing the arb risk between	Raymond Clutts	-	3/10/2000
5904	You gotta read this--Much more blatant than we had suggested cbs.marketwatch.c	Curtis E. Bemis	-	3/10/2000
5903	In Joe's interview earlier, he mentioned that selling the LD was just about	samoyed	-	3/10/2000
5902	<<3:30 Conference call>> This could get real interesting. He will	samoyed	-	3/10/2000
5901	Sounds like you guys heard the same thing I did. Joe seemed to say, now with t	samoyed	-	3/10/2000
5900	CNBC reports that Q will hold a 3:30 Conference call today to talk about recent	SJS	-	3/10/2000
5899	Here's an image that summarizes the state approval status. denverpost.com	beach3	-	3/10/2000
5898	Curtis......we're on the same wavelength, bud. I watched him too. I'd	SJS	-	3/10/2000
5897	Interesting thought-- If USW can't get all the approvals, Q walks away. I	Curtis E. Bemis	-	3/10/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):