SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ACLY- ACCELR8. Year 2000 Stock
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1518 7 0 ACLY
Emcee:  stockvalinvestor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
593 >>>>>>>>>>SOROS, SOROS, SOROS<<<<<ThirdEye-10/31/1997
592 Not to mention having one of the hardest working, motivated, ethical CEO's ThirdEye-10/31/1997
591 SOROS, I am a little surprised at you. Yes, little ACLY has depended on a few cThirdEye-10/31/1997
590 Mostly the bit about insurance policies and limited customers. I know true forSOROS-10/30/1997
589 Which sections are you referring to? eomThirdEye-10/30/1997
588 NEWS sec.yahoo.com What about that last few sections? Thoughts?SOROS-10/30/1997
587 Forget the year 2000 problems, any comments on the problems of 1997 and ACLYSteven M. Lulewicz-10/27/1997
586 Interesting article underscores magnitude of yr 2000 problems..: SEC Orders Fialex s.-10/23/1997
585 Mr. Tom Geimer of ACLY had very favorable mention in Denver Post yesterday. ChKathy Riley-10/20/1997
584 Listen to the taped accelr8 conference at 800 938 0941 Lots of great info. I IVAN1-10/16/1997
583 Is ACLY overvalued ? If Zacks is predicting .12 earnings for quarter ending 10Joe T-10/15/1997
582 Correction on an earlier post: TG did NOT allude(in the CC) to the value of anThirdEye-10/15/1997
581 David, LOL ... >>> (for those who just must roll their own)<<&lPeach-10/15/1997
580 Great post, Marshall! ... I agree completely ... ACLY is in the catbird seat! Peach-10/15/1997
579 Thanks, Marsh. That was a pretty good shot. Between you and David, the picture ThirdEye-10/14/1997
578 taoman, It is hard to respond to your questions since I am an IBM mainframer aHands Off-10/14/1997
577 Taoman - <i>the options would be to rewrite all that Fortran into COBOL David Eddy-10/14/1997
576 Yup, those heady valuations of Y2K companies are just marketing. Personally, I ThirdEye-10/14/1997
575 Taken from Motley Fool Evening News... Information technology services companyDD™-10/14/1997
574 Hmmmmmmm...If stock does this well with NO news, wonder what happens when we GEjgibbs-10/14/1997
573 Hehehehe...ahem.....heheheheeeee...ahem!Stop that!ThirdEye-10/14/1997
572 >> Expensive and time consuming either way. << "Us, worriedDone, gone.-10/14/1997
571 Thanks, David. That's pretty much the answer I was looking for. I guess theThirdEye-10/14/1997
570 Taoman - <i>under the impression that Fortran is an older business softwDavid Eddy-10/14/1997
569 Sargent - <i>They have a very complex reservation system (Sabre) as wellDavid Eddy-10/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):