SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
T/FIF Portfolio
An SI Board Since August 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1073 31 0
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
598 Mike: Why not cut and paste the PNAS abstract? What we need are lists. Thesescaram(o)uche-2/18/1999
597 Yup, there's commentary here on an ongoing basis, it seems, regarding GZMO.scaram(o)uche-2/18/1999
596 Richard, I came here through the CEPH board and read that CEPH was 'on topBWAC-2/18/1999
595 market cap to book ratio. this thread is devoted to good-science companies witscaram(o)uche-2/18/1999
594 Richard--Further info on CEPH in case some have not seen their web site describfreelyhovering-2/18/1999
593 off topic/neuregulins heheh, well if you say that you don't know enough abMike McFarland-2/18/1999
592 < CEPH Low MC:book (3)> What is MC:book?? I have an option ticker @ woLLCF-2/18/1999
591 Mike: I don't know enough about the subject to judge it. Post away! I wiscaram(o)uche-2/18/1999
590 ...so any comments about enhancing synaptic efficacy versus remyelination. I hMike McFarland-2/18/1999
589 David: CEPH is not off-topic in the least. Low MC:book (3) with an approved pscaram(o)uche-2/18/1999
588 This is your second post to this thread with no content. I can let them pass, scaram(o)uche-2/18/1999
587 Chill man, I meant to post it on the CEPH board. Rah Rah limit-2/18/1999
586 can we please avoid the damn rah-rah posts in this thread, please? If you don&scaram(o)uche-2/18/1999
585 Thanks for the heads-up. I hope it was an "insider" Long and patientlimit-2/18/1999
584 jeffrey: I don't know of any decent discussion of IMNR. I do know that Poscaram(o)uche-2/18/1999
583 Richard, IMNR has gotten relatively down in price. Do you have a view or can yojeffbas-2/18/1999
582 Jim, any idea how this compares with Caliper's efforts ? nignigel bates-2/18/1999
581 Jim and David: Please keep posting this great stuff. Thanks, Rick scaram(o)uche-2/18/1999
580 <Slightly OT> If anyone cares 1500 CEPH May 10 calls traded today on a LLCF-2/18/1999
579 Slightly OT edtn.com A group of strange bedfellows--electronic engineers, biocJim Oravetz-2/18/1999
578 Strongly recommend using a source other than Yahoo! threads for info. Several scaram(o)uche-2/18/1999
577 Richard the following was allegedly said (per Yahoo 7097) on the ENMD conferencjeffbas-2/17/1999
576 Rick: I caught the drift of what you meant. Thanks for your input. I will moMicawber-2/17/1999
575 Yes, I know about Recap's failings. I wrote you prematurely before checking5,17,37,5,101,...-2/16/1999
574 Richard--I was not sure which thread to post to you on. Check out CEPH as it hfreelyhovering-2/16/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News