SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Pro Choice Action Team
An SI Board Since February 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
948 8 0
Emcee:  YlangYlangBreeze Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
598Lip curl into a sneer? They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Here is hoYlangYlangBreeze-2/19/2001
597Jorj, AJ knows nothing much about anything. All he is trying to do by making wihobo-2/19/2001
596But in modern times, eugenicists tend to be from the righteous right. Have you Win Smith-2/19/2001
595Did you read that one before you posted it, Tim? You seem to have found a new vWin Smith-2/19/2001
594Your sources are getting a little obscure, PROLIFE. www.feministsforlife.org doWin Smith-2/19/2001
593<i>Your utter lack of compassion for this victim of violent crime tells evTimF-2/19/2001
592Quotes from Margaret Sanger: "If we must have welfare, give it to the ricPROLIFE-2/19/2001
591I meant before you "go" to begin the research you are clearly planningE-2/19/2001
590<i>I doubt that www.babiesaregiftsfromheaven.com will do that one.</i&gPROLIFE-2/19/2001
589Projecting your values on others again, joe blow?YlangYlangBreeze-2/19/2001
588"Before you go" I'm not leaving E. And another thing, that counteaverage joe-2/19/2001
587Negative psychological side affects? Like sadness? Fear of the lunatics at the cYlangYlangBreeze-2/19/2001
586What a wonderful service you would have performed if your "makes me very suE-2/19/2001
585A real neutral source there, jos schmoe. WWW.ABORTIONINFO.COMYlangYlangBreeze-2/19/2001
584I think that the pool of available babies will not only grow but become increasiYlangYlangBreeze-2/19/2001
583Was that the same kind of "scientific" survey that "proved" Win Smith-2/19/2001
582So how many kids are you going to take? Did you even look at those babies? AcornYlangYlangBreeze-2/19/2001
581average joe, Why are you harassing poet about topics that are not relevant to thJorj X Mckie-2/19/2001
580WOW! Offshore fraud? Look what I found from your link!! ens.lycos.com Fondo peraverage joe-2/19/2001
579A survey was conducted of 1900 women who had had abortions. The survey asked &quPROLIFE-2/18/2001
578You're not worth arguing with. clicktheplanet.orgE-2/18/2001
577Get your facts straight vowel, RU486 is not safe... abortioninfo.net But don'average joe-2/18/2001
576I seem to recall that you think fertilized eggs are capable of suffering. Was thE-2/18/2001
575BTW, there was a conversation on another thread in which Steven Rogers posted anE-2/18/2001
574Oh, look, surprise surprise, PROLIFE makes no distinction between a fertilized eE-2/18/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News