SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Boston Scientific (BSX) Any Comments???
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
798 25 0 BSX
Emcee:  Ivan Gao Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
598 Phew! Broke 42 then came back to close above it. Anybody paying attention besmmeggs-11/9/1998
597 mmeggs I am in a hold position. My first thoughts on the Japan situation isJohn Carragher-11/7/1998
596 Here's my two cents: In the face of numerous analyst downgrades, allegatiommeggs-11/7/1998
595 Heavy Trading of Boston Scientific Options Investigated By LAURA JOHANNES DoJohn Carragher-11/6/1998
594 To: the thread. If you think you need a lawyer, may I suggest you try the folIlaine-11/6/1998
593 Can't touch that post. That parsley gig was amazing.Justice Reed-11/6/1998
592 Justice, Buddy, one more quick question, since you are 'da Man' Is tImpristine-11/5/1998
591 You're Right, Justice, you are Mr Altruistic Dude... I commend you for yourImpristine-11/5/1998
590 Class actions are different from medical malpractice. In class actions, the vaJustice Reed-11/5/1998
589 Hi Tip, not only has he done it at other threads, but there seems to be some kiIlaine-11/5/1998
588 I did notify the web mistress. I was trying to be nice by speaking to him firsyard_man-11/5/1998
587 Tip, an addendum, if you read Mr. Reed's posts, he is doing the same thing Ilaine-11/5/1998
586 Tip, FWIW, I agree with you. It's not an ethical question, but lawyers focIlaine-11/5/1998
585 imo Your using this board for your companies personal gain not for the sharehoJohn Carragher-11/5/1998
584 >>The biggest problem for the company is the loss of productive time yard_man-11/5/1998
583 Hi Tippet, Beauford T.'s a newbee here on SI and has an investment style ofOldAIMGuy-11/5/1998
582 Ok. I'll contact someone on your behalf. You don't seem to understandyard_man-11/5/1998
581 These forums are for discussion about the company, particularly as it may affecJustice Reed-11/5/1998
580 If it drops below 40 on a pullback, I might just buy a few calls as a contrariayard_man-11/5/1998
579 Hi T, Not to distract everyone from the Barrister, but as I was saying about BSOldAIMGuy-11/5/1998
578 Problem is you are overstepping what is allowed on SI. Enough is enough. Postyard_man-11/5/1998
577 I have an ethical duty to make a thorough factual investigation, both before anJustice Reed-11/5/1998
576 Justice, Buddy, Please come back, I need to sue someone very bad, I just have Impristine-11/5/1998
575 CB. It is not proper and if he were reported to SI, he wouldn't be allowedyard_man-11/5/1998
574 Mr. Reed, would you care to explain exactly how what you are doing differs fromIlaine-11/5/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):