SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
609 I don't think Cisco has $10 billion dollars to burn. They would also useGreg Jung-3/4/1997
608 <<here is a rumour on the street that csco will make a competitive bid foWigglesworth-3/4/1997
607 >>>X2 obsession:<<< Here is a list of those who have the x2 Scrapps-3/4/1997
606 So LU will get into the data business... SCHACHT EMPHASIZES SPEED -- The follobill c.-3/4/1997
605 Michael, I would have to disagree with you, I think its more probable then not.Tim Luke-3/4/1997
604 X2 obsession: What a bunch of whiners! Scrapps, down dawg! As if X2 is thGreg Jung-3/4/1997
603 Thanks for the link. So the rumor was from a group of day-traders? C'mon Mike 2.0-3/4/1997
602 Hi, I heard the rumour on a web-based "trading association" (daytradManfred-3/4/1997
601 Greg, that article certainly does NOT dismiss the possibility. The probabilityMichael Anthony-3/4/1997
600 Why dont you tell us where you heard the rumor? The only people talking about Steven Angelil-3/4/1997
599 David, while we could debate ad nauseum whether USRX or COMS is the weaker of tDan Woodbury-3/4/1997
598 What street did you hear that on? Last nights news dismisses that probabilityGreg Jung-3/4/1997
597 To all, rumour there is a rumour on the street that csco will make a competitiManfred-3/4/1997
596 You got it David. The street was already punishing COMS. WITH usrx, they wereMichael Anthony-3/4/1997
595 Not sure I get your reasoning! Let's see, COMS was at 39 on the day the medavid decamp-3/4/1997
594 <i>You're right. It makes me sick too. Not Casey Cowell, seems like hMilan Shah-3/4/1997
593 Tim, that's probably wishful thinking, but it could happen if CSCO gets theMichael Anthony-3/4/1997
592 Michael, You made a good choice by being in USRX, I think USRX would be better Tim Luke-3/4/1997
591 I sold USRX the day after the merger was announced. Then I bought COMS. When Michael Anthony-3/4/1997
590 Jeff I don't know if this has been posted about a couple old buddies.......Scrapps-3/4/1997
589 I've noticed that the MM's keep uping the ask size without moving the pMichael Anthony-3/4/1997
588 CNBC interview with Jim Oelshlager of White Oak Growth Stock Fund holds alot ofRon Pratt-3/4/1997
587 Tom, ALL, 2 pieces of news: pcquote.newsalert.com pcquote.newsalert.com LindLinda Pearson-3/4/1997
586 Jim - A long time ago I saw an explanation of their fair market portfolio. Unfkech-3/4/1997
585 Charles, remember this is a public thread. I don't think it's too smartDwight E. Karlsen-3/4/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News