SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Neocon's Seminar Thread
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1112 21 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
612Neocon, if you get a chance to read this lengthy book review, I would appreciategao seng-5/16/2001
611I thought the name was familiar. siliconinvestor.comgao seng-5/15/2001
610Short version is this: Alan Sokal is a physicist who submitted an article parodMitch Blevins-5/15/2001
609Thanks. I will read it tonight.gao seng-5/15/2001
608<i>So how can we get this thread back on topic? I propose a return to discMitch Blevins-5/15/2001
607The same can be said for the Darwinist arguement. The use of the term "neugao seng-5/15/2001
606Thanks for the links. Good reading... It reminds me of how much the human concMitch Blevins-5/15/2001
605Yes, I remember reading something about this... The "music of the spheres&Mitch Blevins-5/14/2001
604Music Of The Spheres Supports Expansion Of Universe unisci.com In the Beginningao seng-5/14/2001
603Mitch: As a follow-up to the last post, I might also add this critique, which iSolon-5/14/2001
602Hello Mitch, Reading with interest some of the commentary on Dembski. This criSolon-5/14/2001
601You've said alot here, and I agree with much of it. But I'd like to addMitch Blevins-5/13/2001
600I have postulated on this thread that I believe there are 3 fundmanetal forces ogao seng-5/13/2001
599The short version of Hoyles cosmological argument... <i>The physical lawsMitch Blevins-5/13/2001
598<i>Mitch, would you be open to the possibility of design being involved?&lMitch Blevins-5/13/2001
597I think we both share a curiosity about the universe. Would you agree with thgao seng-5/12/2001
596Mitch, would you be open to the <i>possibility</i> of design being igreenspirit-5/12/2001
595You may use poorly designed analogies to explain weakness of Dembski's theorgao seng-5/12/2001
594Tomorrow, then. Have a good night.Mitch Blevins-5/12/2001
593oopes wait for an edit please. I will get back to you. I must reread origins.ogao seng-5/12/2001
592Sometimes I feel like a nut or I sure would like an Almond Joy right now... YouMitch Blevins-5/12/2001
591<i>What utter nonsense. Dembski stresses that design can not be used as a Mitch Blevins-5/12/2001
590What utter nonsense. Dembski stresses that design can not be used as a default gao seng-5/12/2001
589Demski's short version of argument is as follows: If we come upon an artifaMitch Blevins-5/12/2001
588Not a Nut <b>or</b&gGraystone-5/12/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News