SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
XXXXXXX
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2563 5 0
Emcee:  Joseph G. Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
613 J, In 1962 JFK confronted the US steel industry, etc, and there was a "cJoseph G.-7/29/1997
612 This is probably a silly indicator, and not at all worthy of this thread, but wepicure-7/29/1997
611 J-- My apologies (off topic). Unfortunately, it is too late to edit my post. DD™-7/29/1997
610 J-- Here we do our best to enlighten. Or not, as the case (or file) may be. Janice Shell-7/29/1997
609 J-- <i>You must not sign yourself "DD". The <b>proper&lJanice Shell-7/29/1997
608 J-- Thank you for the explanations. A problem worthy of the X files, of courseepicure-7/29/1997
607 J-- It is most mysterious. If you look on the "subject" page, your Janice Shell-7/29/1997
606 J-- I'm beginning to enjoy the cryptic nature of this thread <ggg>. DD™-7/29/1997
605 J-- What happened to it? It was there when I left. Who steals them and for whepicure-7/29/1997
604 J-- Taht's better. But clearly you don't understand the necessity of Janice Shell-7/29/1997
603 J-- Sorry. Won't happen again. Jepicure-7/29/1997
602 J-- I confess that I'd feel MUCH more comfortable long if the Garz would pJanice Shell-7/29/1997
601 J-- I am <i>VERY</i> sorry, but if you wish to participate in thisJanice Shell-7/29/1997
600 J-- Ummmm..."Consensus"??? Interesting, but pretty superficial scJanice Shell-7/29/1997
599 J-- Hmmmmm... Vague. Wish we knew more.... I mean, is he basing this on astrJanice Shell-7/29/1997
598 J5, I can understand her model [upon recent tweeking] gives Dow = 8,800 IF lonJoseph G.-7/29/1997
597 J, From Burt Masnick, a reliable poster on the Intel thread, comes the news thBlueCrab-7/29/1997
596 J, Glad to please. It is also pretty accurate, as far as historical info is inJoseph G.-7/29/1997
595 Interesting reading.epicure-7/29/1997
594 J, Was busy reading the following: usastores.com. J+Joseph G.-7/29/1997
593 J-- Here is where I came across his prediction, pretty vague.. techstocks.com MulhollandDrive-7/29/1997
592 J-- Well, not everyone listens to Arch, which tends to make his predictions inJanice Shell-7/29/1997
591 J- Ah, February, I remember it well! And because of that, I wonder if his ThuMulhollandDrive-7/29/1997
590 J-- Uh-oh. Haven't heard anything about Arch recently, but he was right tJanice Shell-7/29/1997
589 J6, The daily lunch time rally has become extremely predictable ... J+Joseph G.-7/29/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News