SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Siebel Systems (SEBL) - strong buy?
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6974 178 0 SEBL
Emcee:  Nick Tingle Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6149Maybe they decided to hold off earnings :) (I think Tom just wants the spot lighmtnlady-7/17/2002
6148There's at least a 100mm revenue range in the analyst expectations, of coursLizzie Tudor-7/17/2002
6147I know what you mean. A bad sebl report will crush the software sector for anotUncle Frank-7/17/2002
6146They're really dragging out the release. The conference calls starts in 35 Uncle Frank-7/17/2002
6145I don't think I've ever been so nervous about an earnings rpt in my lifeLizzie Tudor-7/17/2002
6144<i>Are we counting toward Blast Off or Firing Squad? :)</i> NeitherMike Buckley-7/17/2002
6143I've been asking myself the same question for the last few days.Uncle Frank-7/17/2002
6142<i> About 60 minutes left. Let the count down begin.</i> Are we coDr. Id-7/17/2002
6141About 60 minutes left. Let the count down begin.Uncle Frank-7/17/2002
6140<i>Tom has a lot more in common with Larry than he'd like to believe.&Mike Buckley-7/15/2002
6139<< Tom Siebel has received approximately 8 million shares in new grants foDavid Howe-7/15/2002
6138<i>By the way, neither Buffett nor Gates have ever received a stock optionEnricoPalazzo-7/15/2002
6137David, I don't believe the figures in the Barron's article relate to ehueyone-7/15/2002
6136<i><< To the contrary, unless the "bubble years" return, mEnricoPalazzo-7/15/2002
6135<< To the contrary, unless the "bubble years" return, most of thDavid Howe-7/15/2002
6134<i>The backward numbers are a distorted reflection of option grants duringEnricoPalazzo-7/15/2002
6133What got me going on this subject was the increasing number of articles I'veDavid Howe-7/15/2002
6132I'm starting to understand what you are trying to say regarding the bubble aThomas Tam-7/15/2002
6131If options expire worthless then there is no dilution of any kind. MSFT emploDavid Howe-7/15/2002
6130I don't agree, if option grants remain as obscene in terms of the number of Thomas Tam-7/15/2002
6129That article has no relationship to the method Coke will be using. We're noDavid Howe-7/15/2002
6128<i>In this case, it's a way to distinguish between the CEO and the comDr. Id-7/15/2002
6127<i>In the case of Siebel I suspect a large portion comes from options <hueyone-7/15/2002
6126Generally I would agree with you about Siebel not missing, but the problem is thmuckraker71-7/15/2002
6125<I> I completely agree with this method and if SEBL adopted it I believe ipaul_philp-7/15/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News