SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
James Cramer
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
766 33 0
Emcee:  cicak Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
616 congratulations on your short today. i wish you well. i never perceived you amr.mark-6/7/1999
615 I shorted TSCM today. Do I still get to be a 'Cramer worshipper'? I gMama Bear-6/7/1999
614 have you got a bunch of little signs on you that all say push here? mr.mark-6/7/1999
613 <i>i've "pointed' things out to you before,</i> Ahh, Deliveryman-6/7/1999
612 i've "pointed' things out to you before, deliveryman, and youmr.mark-6/7/1999
611 Fine, you only stated facts..... Please point out the facts in this post: <Deliveryman-6/7/1999
610 i've seen some pretty negative (shall we use your word... childish?) postmr.mark-6/7/1999
609 <i>all the cramer worshippers are </i> It does seem childish to aDeliveryman-6/7/1999
608 Hi Adam - just a follow up with another article I found... interesting to notecicak-6/5/1999
607 Hi Adam - you bring up a very interesting point. By James Cramer sharing his stcicak-6/5/1999
606 are you kidding me? all the cramer worshippers are doing their best to ignmr.mark-6/4/1999
605 Ha! That's too funny. I would love someone to create a shockwave movie depiAdam Weiner-6/4/1999
604 using the boxing metaphor... cramer kinda' reminds me of the old slapstickmr.mark-6/3/1999
603 >> btw, where does it say subscription numbers are swelling? According tAdam Weiner-6/3/1999
602 i liked you better when you were taking jabs. btw, where does it say subscriptmr.mark-6/3/1999
601 Anybody read Cramer's "Giving away Trade Secrets" article? CrameAdam Weiner-6/3/1999
600 <i> ASSume whatever you like. You should be able to figure out that Stocker-6/2/1999
599 <i> i'm just trying to see why you are impressed by a guy who says heStocker-6/2/1999
598 <<I'll take it as a given>> <b>ASS</b>ume whatever taxikid-6/2/1999
597 mr. mark, re:"but before we organize a parade in cramer's honor...&quoJon Stept-6/2/1999
596 Adam, re:"Where do I sign up for that deal? :-)..." Yeah, I agree, bJon Stept-6/2/1999
595 hi jon, re: <i>"Cramer is strong enough to admit and learn from it.mr.mark-6/1/1999
594 I agree, it takes a lot of courage to openly admit one's mistakes. Then agaAdam Weiner-6/1/1999
593 Adam, re:"He knew the stock was a loser..." Hi Adam, I want to commJon Stept-6/1/1999
592 Given that there was nothing of substance to your response other than an insultStocker-6/1/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News