Cistron Biotechnology(CIST)$.30 | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
Cistron Biotechnology(CIST)$.30

An SI Board Since October 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2742	9	0	CIST

Emcee: harry zelatis	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
617	It is pretty surprising as a novice trader that my <$3000 order can be count	John Liu	-	4/25/1997
616	What does that tell you???????...they are selling stock that they have either b	RAY WACLAWSKY	-	4/25/1997
615	John, These MM's are whimps when it comes to filling orders more than 10,0	Laertes Manuelidis	-	4/25/1997
614	I decided late in the day (30 minute before market close) to pick up 12,000 sha	John Liu	-	4/25/1997
613	Picked up a little more this morning. Now long with 43,500 shares. Steve	Stephen McCullough	-	4/25/1997
612	In general, I'm almost always opposed to buy-backs in biotech, as cash is K	scaram(o)uche	-	4/25/1997
611	I'd also be thinking of a stock buyback to raise share value. CIST could ta	Dr. John M. de Castro	-	4/25/1997
610	Not much, John, no. During the long period of the lawsuit, they weren't ab	scaram(o)uche	-	4/25/1997
609	I dont know who is willing to sell, but its not me. In looking at the last cou	Stephen Sedmak	-	4/24/1997
608	You are dealing with a bulletin board stock...anything goes! What is important	RAY WACLAWSKY	-	4/24/1997
607	It's nice to see the bid move up from .21 It seems that most of the trades	Stephen Sedmak	-	4/24/1997
606	There are liabilities including the income tax liability for the income from th	RAY WACLAWSKY	-	4/24/1997
605	Just wondering why is the book value .43 a share and the cash .46 a shares. Do	John Liu	-	4/24/1997
604	If you have the patience, 28mm sh/12mm book value=.43 +++ value of company and	RAY WACLAWSKY	-	4/24/1997
603	CIST, a sleeping beauty. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ	icecreambug	-	4/24/1997
602	Good point, Vadim. Like you, I don't favor the quick release of intrinsic	John Metcalf	-	4/23/1997
601	I think you can also add to your valuation a significant accumulated tax credit	Vadim D. Marchenko	-	4/23/1997
600	John, $.41 per share is a conservative valuation. According to the company'	John Metcalf	-	4/23/1997
599	I agree, one hundred percent. However, I think that reverse splits are filed o	scaram(o)uche	-	4/22/1997
598	John, in reference to a February post, do you still value CIST at .41 p/share?	John Chylek	-	4/22/1997
597	A reverse split would be beneficial in that it could lead to listing the stock.	John Metcalf	-	4/22/1997
596	John: I think you've hit on it! REPR ( Rumored Eight Page Report ) could	George Dysert	-	4/22/1997
595	Maybe somebody saw a draft copy of the rumored EPR (Eight Page Report). John	John Chylek	-	4/22/1997
594	Hey everybody. Whats with the volume today. I am too used to a vol of zero I su	Stephen Sedmak	-	4/22/1997
593	While I subscribe to the popular idea that reverse splits invariably lead to a	Jack Phillips	-	4/22/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):