SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
CCB Free Speech Board
An SI Board Since August 2015
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
538 25 5 CCB
Emcee:  Luvin_It Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
62When one loses a argument or proven wrong out come the insults.Appears to be staGlazeddonut-9/5/2015
61Could we please stop the personal attacks? Repeat offenders will be suspended.SI Ron (Crazy Music Man)-9/5/2015
60Hoov, Is there truth to the fact that you were once under contract to Zen and noLuvin_It-9/5/2015
59I hope it generates thoughtful discussion like what Helo4 is attempting to stimuLuvin_It-9/5/2015
58Accusations and name calling won't be tolerated, act like a grown up. First Luvin_It19/5/2015
57LUVIN It thanks again for another great board on the graphite sector.I do have oGlazeddonut-9/5/2015
56Hoov for your information here is an example of how management should handle thiRuddyMongoose-9/4/2015
55TZero before. RZero now. Lhoov19/4/2015
54Ruddy, what is clear is that you were not floating a hypothetical, you have now NuclearCrystals29/4/2015
53Ruddy, do you need to see your own words, yet again? If Duncan is not in violathoov19/4/2015
52"I am 1000% certain Duncan fully adhered to the spirit of the regulatory gRuddyMongoose-9/4/2015
51Hey crystals are you on the ccb payroll like Hoov? What is your job title?? Do yGMPInvestor-9/4/2015
50Zenyatta is holding all of the cards. We have the graphite all the hi tech indusGMPInvestor-9/4/2015
49You've never been right about anything, Ruddy. Ever. Just sayin'. Larhoov39/4/2015
48Looks like I was right again: "Hoov do you approve of the comments CEO DuRuddyMongoose-9/4/2015
47Ruddy, I didn't take your words out of context. You made a conditional argumhoov-9/4/2015
46Ruddy, so now your hypothetical is no longer hypothetical as you have named DuncNuclearCrystals-9/4/2015
45Did I make a mistake? Oh, well. Subject 59632 Larhoov-9/4/2015
44hoov let's stop playing games with semantics and having you take my commentsRuddyMongoose19/4/2015
43Your argument is specious, helo. Any company official could conceivably discloGlazeddonut29/4/2015
42You're TFS for a comment. Read it again. Larhoov-9/4/2015
41Hmmm hoov are you sure when you say "always" I know from a quick glaGlazeddonut-9/4/2015
40Yes any company official could conceivably disclose non-public material informathoov-9/4/2015
39Helo grasped the application of a false dichotomy (it would appear, due to the lhoov-9/4/2015
38hoov-9/4/2015
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):