SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
All About Sun Microsystems
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
64865 326 0 JAVA
Emcee:  Carmine Cammarosano Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
62515so I guess it was efficent from late august to the end of december then....cfimx-1/4/2005
62514leavittbrothers.comcfimx-1/4/2005
62513Once again the "efficient market" theory is discredited (nothing has cCharles Tutt-1/4/2005
62512solaris has been out for decades. the market has spoken and they don't wantcfimx-1/4/2005
62511I recall one of your posts saying that since Solaris 10 is not released this quaalydar-1/4/2005
62510Hello Charles. I was looking at an intraday chart. There was NO bounce after thesixty2nds-1/4/2005
62509broke my rule. ;-) only buy when THEY buy. And THEY didn't buy yet. ;-)cfimx-1/4/2005
62508when you read these inanities, one wonders how much longer this charade can go ocfimx-1/3/2005
62507Excerpted from Forbes article re: Dell's manufacturing prowess. Funny, McNeQwikSand-1/3/2005
62506I think the WSJ's "oil will never again go back down" article doesQwikSand-1/3/2005
62505<i>sun executives were Creatures of the bubble, not victims of it. if anytQwikSand-1/3/2005
62504its always the "quiet" period even during conference calls. they don&#cfimx-1/3/2005
62503sun executives were Creatures of the bubble, not victims of it. if anything theycfimx-1/3/2005
62502I would have preferred that response to the one he gave. JMHO. Charles Tutt (SCharles Tutt-1/3/2005
62501I'm curious what specifically about today's action (if anything) scares Charles Tutt-1/3/2005
62500Not for me...I stopped out at $5.11 about 2hrs ago. Ladies and Gents, right or wsixty2nds-1/3/2005
62499I'm surprised that volumes here near the close aren't higher; that suggeCharles Tutt-1/3/2005
62498The next half hour +/- could be interesting. JMHO. Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-1/3/2005
62497Or a replay of 1991-1995, depending on how far back one remembers SUNW and how mvj4sun-1/3/2005
62496Dont forget that this is also a "quiet period" for SUNW execs, which mvj4sun-1/3/2005
62495we could both be on medicaid in a few years. ggJohn Carragher-1/3/2005
62494I think that depends on whether all the money that was poured into R&D ultimCharles Tutt-1/3/2005
62493He certainly couldn't have done worst for stockholders in the last few yearsJohn Carragher-1/3/2005
62492I don't know why he said what he did. Maybe he'd just come from a meetiCharles Tutt-1/3/2005
62491I wondered if you would have any interesting comments on McNealy's interviewMephisto-1/3/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News