SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
All About Sun Microsystems
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
64865 326 0 JAVA
Emcee:  Carmine Cammarosano Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
62940Actually I got what you said-----being obnoxious and facetious on this. In mMJ-4/29/2005
62939Sorry MJ, I was kidding in a sort of obnoxious way. In fact the $5.00 (or whateQwikSand-4/29/2005
62938Sounds like the stockholders get zilch----zero. mjMJ-4/28/2005
62937Yes, this is what's called an inverted double-reverse LBO, where the sharehoQwikSand-4/28/2005
62936So who gets the $5. or 5.50 per share? Silver Lake, Mc Nealy, stockholders?? MJ-4/28/2005
62935ROFL!!! he's doing it before the market does it in. 3.50 topsBox-By-The-Riviera™-4/28/2005
62934Ok, plutocrats of the world, let's have a competing offer! Do I hear $6???? QwikSand-4/28/2005
6293317:20 SUNW Sun Microsystems: BWeek states McNealy may take co private (3.44 -0.sixty2nds-4/28/2005
62932Yeah, those last five years have really been memorable ones for Sun, haven'tQwikSand-4/23/2005
62931I can understand why McNealy is grinning here forbes.com 66 million over the lupanddown-4/23/2005
62930Buying op under 3.60 look at the charts mdMykldee-4/21/2005
62929I just noticed that there is a grand total of ZERO "Strong Buy" ratingQwikSand-4/21/2005
62928Sure hope that you are correct. At least SUNW has the financial power now to taJDN-4/21/2005
62927I believe there is a major shift going on in tech now. IBM is crashing and othealydar-4/20/2005
62926Seems to me you just described Scott!! (gg) jdnJDN-4/19/2005
62925Headcount is a KEY issue. There is absolutely nothing that can give investors cStormweaver-4/18/2005
62924I agree that you can't step in the same river twice, but I think it remains Charles Tutt-4/17/2005
62923right on target..the world changed and they have yet to notice.cfimx-4/17/2005
62922LOL rest catch breath LOL so let me get this straight..while HP and IBM havecfimx-4/17/2005
62921<i>Sun _does_ need to learn to make money in bad times like the present, bQwikSand-4/17/2005
62920Sun _does_ need to learn to make money in bad times like the present, but oh, boCharles Tutt-4/17/2005
62919big banks like goldman and moran stanley bear strearns are painfully slow to dowcfimx-4/17/2005
62918doesn't matter.. their CEOs (yes they actually have them) positioned their ccfimx-4/17/2005
62917IBM & HP -- not on computers AFAICT JMHO. Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-4/16/2005
62916Well, I was thinking along the lines of technology which of course the Chinese GJDN-4/16/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News