SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
All About Sun Microsystems
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
64865 326 0 JAVA
Emcee:  Carmine Cammarosano Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
63015This is what I'm talking about when I refer to the potential Sun has. This iDavid MacNeil-5/11/2005
63014Many companies have stopped giving earnings projections. Its a damned if you do David MacNeil-5/11/2005
63013no earnings projection no p/e ratios no balance sheet analysis? whoops! it feelscfimx-5/11/2005
63012A 5 year chart is essentially looking in the rear view mirror. What needs to be David MacNeil-5/11/2005
63011being to "bullish" on sun micro. ;-)cfimx-5/11/2005
63010Of what were you convicted? :-) Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-5/11/2005
63009no when I get conviction I stick with it....its not complicated.cfimx-5/11/2005
63008Oh, I thought you had a theory you hadn't expressed before. Thanks anyway, rkral-5/11/2005
63007a very large retrenchment is in store with a complete elimination of sparc and acfimx-5/11/2005
63006room222, Mark asked first ... "<I>what other large shoe are you referrkral-5/11/2005
63005tell us why its UNDERVALUED....please be specific.cfimx-5/10/2005
63004<i>i call it like i see it...and if you think that things have been good pMark O. Halverson-5/10/2005
63003i call it like i see it...and if you think that things have been good pull up a cfimx-5/10/2005
63002Well, I'm certainly not trying to muzzle you. I just find your posts increduDavid MacNeil-5/10/2005
63001you know you're right.....and that's exactly what I have been so you migcfimx-5/10/2005
63000Room222 the following is also from Briefing.com In Play "on the wires"sixty2nds-5/10/2005
62999If Sun spent 25 billion on an acquisition, you would perceive it as negative. IDavid MacNeil-5/10/2005
62998Tarantella is oldSCO. I wonder if there are any rights they think they are buyiI_Banker-5/10/2005
62997omg why are they even bothering with this minutiae? as if a $25m acuisition mattcfimx-5/10/2005
6299608:06 TTLA Sun Micro to buy Tarantella for $25 mln, or $0.90/share (0.83 ) sixty2nds-5/10/2005
62995Not sure what happened here, but here is what I read when I follow the link provDavid MacNeil-5/9/2005
62994Press Release Source: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Sun Changing Landscape of Network David MacNeil-5/9/2005
62993Either way, it's round-off error +/-. JMHO. Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-5/8/2005
62992Sun: Loss is deeper than thought Published: May 6, 2005, 3:22 PM PDT By Stephen DiViT-5/7/2005
62991The beggars, in this case, being the SUNW shareholders :-). I'm sure McNealyQwikSand-5/7/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News