SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
63324 355 15 IMMU
Emcee:  idahoranch1 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
63093Well I know how I’m voting on this… MKT Capital Ltd. and Lucien Selce (togetherOlecranon-April 24
63092AUPH: Call from large investor for removal of CEO. I personally agree with thiDavidoff3April 23
63091finance.yahoo.comjargonweary8April 21
63090FYI…. AUPH AGM May 15,2025 Noon Webcast Should be interestingCFL Invest 1-April 17
63089The comparisons with IMMU seem to me to be only superficial. IMMU had a founderjargonweary4April 16
63088I'd like to make some political observations about Patrick also but have helgalt4April 16
63087Sent you a private reply, as I make some political observations and don't wastockdoc772April 15
63086Fear wins again! The last while has been pretty brutal for me too. In fact, I jerickerickson3April 15
63085Abraxane, difficult to toleratedorightbythem-April 14
63084My understanding is that the only real product he has ever brought to market wasstockdoc771April 13
63083No I sold out several years ago.stockdoc771April 13
63082Is PSS a glib salesman? Yes. Does he sometimes engage in political or other tactOlecranon3April 13
63081Do you still own IBRX ?plhky3465-April 13
63080I can't take Chat GPT seriously. PSS might be genuinely supportive of RFK, ostockdoc773April 12
63079I suppose it's reassuring that Patrick Soon-Shiong of IBRX, whose supreme amghettogoulash1April 11
63078Sorry. For some reason I was able to read it all and I don’t have a WSJ subscrijargonweary-April 11
63077Thanks for posting, though I could not read the entire article because it was beluckydog88-April 11
63076finance.yahoo.comjargonweary-April 11
63075I don’t think dilution is ever meaningless.jargonweary1April 11
63074Now that has been some ride in a short amount of time! (newsmax)luckydog88-April 11
63073Based on Whale Wisdom, the $75m (30.5m shares) buy increases the number of 13F sOlecranon-April 11
63072Armistice Capital was the buyermannamal2April 11
63071Revenues have been surging at a "crawl" pace. Institutional ownershipgalt1April 11
63070I’m confused by this offering. Before the offering there were about 700m shares Olecranon-April 11
63069The good news, if there is any in this non-dilutive cash infusion, is that unlikgalt1April 10
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News