Solv Ex (SOLVD) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
Solv Ex (SOLVD)

An SI Board Since April 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
6735	22	0	SOLVD

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
6335	Janice, I've been marveling about the SOLVD longs 'thought' process	Mama Bear	-	3/9/1999
6334	Pain You don't have a clue with regard to recent developments, yet you	BRONCO BILLY	-	3/9/1999
6333	But THIS really IS extraordinary! I've never seen a thread on which so man	Janice Shell	-	3/9/1999
6332	<i>Heck, some of these folks were (are?) sure that the SEC is involved in	Janice Shell	-	3/9/1999
6331	BB, you sure can jump to conclusions with the best of them. The company was de	Mama Bear	-	3/9/1999
6330	Pain Conclusion - you don't know. Just more bull	BRONCO BILLY	-	3/9/1999
6329	BB, better yet, you tell us how you know that there are any 'fundamental de	Mama Bear	-	3/9/1999
6328	Dear Pain Tell us how you KNOW that there are no fundamental developments.	BRONCO BILLY	-	3/9/1999
6327	Ooops... See you at .02, Barb	Mama Bear	-	3/9/1999
6326	fundamental developments = ALUMINUM	norwalk hawk	-	3/9/1999
6325	Of course the longs are unable to face the fact that there are no fundamental d	Mama Bear	-	3/9/1999
6324	Dear Pain The focus should be recent fundamental developments and not on all	BRONCO BILLY	-	3/9/1999
6323	Janice, I can't recall if they ever blamed the Canadians or not. Of course	Mama Bear	-	3/9/1999
6322	Hey Barb! Glad to see this is another one of those threads where everyone goes	Janice Shell	-	3/8/1999
6321	Well, I had quite a walk down memory lane this evening. I ran across the names	Mama Bear	-	3/8/1999
6320	Perhaps this one from 8/25/97 when I said "<i>Just stopped by to che	Mama Bear	-	3/8/1999
6319	Annie, perhaps you are recalling this post from 3/8/98 where I said <i>&	Mama Bear	-	3/8/1999
6318	Ok, here's a post from 4/24/98 where I made my promise to stick around. I s	Mama Bear	-	3/8/1999
6317	Annie, just tell me how to prove a negative. 4 biased folks who have a resent	Mama Bear	-	3/8/1999
6316	my goodness barb! seems that it's you that has to prove you didn't say	Annie	-	3/8/1999
6315	You guys would vote 3 to 1 that SOLVD is a great investment. What does that pro	Mama Bear	-	3/8/1999
6314	Barb, there no way would i wade thru the bunch of posts that have been made on	leigh aulper	-	3/8/1999
6313	leigh, prove it. I say you just made that up. See you at .02, Barb	Mama Bear	-	3/8/1999
6312	Oh mama bear, i don't think you would want to put your word to a vote. I c	leigh aulper	-	3/8/1999
6311	<i>i have performed alot of diligence on boiler rooms & telemarketers	Janice Shell	-	3/7/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):