Northrich Pacific Ventures NPA:V | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
Northrich Pacific Ventures NPA:V

An SI Board Since October 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
7431	20	0	NPA

Emcee: Mike Campagna	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
6356	Greetings Peter I agree with you that the co may not renew the permit.If this	dave herbert	-	8/17/1997
6355	Dave, Because NPA does not have money to explore it further. If they sold eno	Peter Moss	-	8/17/1997
6354	A permit is a legal contract which outlines the obligations of a permit holder	dave herbert	-	8/17/1997
6353	Greetings Peter I am wondering why you believe coni 1 is gone the co has met a	dave herbert	-	8/17/1997
6352	I am not positive but belive that to maintain a claim is about 10,000 per year	dave herbert	-	8/17/1997
6351	Greetings James The coni 1 property was auired from private persons thus requi	dave herbert	-	8/17/1997
6350	John, I don't think they forgot. They don't have money to do anything	Peter Moss	-	8/17/1997
6349	Hi James, Perhaps we should all either fax or e-mail the company w	john mcknight	-	8/17/1997
6348	<now it is possible that they will lose coni2-8. > Taken from the prelim	James Berg	-	8/17/1997
6347	hi michael, reading through the press releases on the compani	john mcknight	-	8/17/1997
6346	i was under the impression that coni-1 belongs to npa permanently. i seem	michael robinson	-	8/17/1997
6345	Hi All please note change of e-mail adress Regards John	john mcknight	-	8/17/1997
6344	Hi Peter, Looks like youve been doing your research , I guess it c	john mcknight	-	8/17/1997
6343	John, Dave, If the NPA stock was trading at $2, would you say that NPA mgmt is	Peter Moss	-	8/17/1997
6342	Greetings John Several thoughts on this There probably has not been significan	dave herbert	-	8/16/1997
6341	Hi Dave, See your point but if MMs were pulling the strings I	john mcknight	-	8/16/1997
6340	Hi John: Yes I can see your point about the company being incompetant, and I	Dave Atkinson	-	8/15/1997
6339	Hi Gerry, well I guess you could be right if someone described th	john mcknight	-	8/15/1997
6338	Ouch! John, regarding your comments, logical would be a good description. Is it	Gerald Oglesby	-	8/15/1997
6337	Hi Dave , Thanks for the update , however it raise some interesting	john mcknight	-	8/15/1997
6336	John: all, the last I was told is the company is still working on getting some	Dave Atkinson	-	8/15/1997
6335	Hi All , In the absence of a reply to my e-mail sent to the company l	john mcknight	-	8/14/1997
6334	Hi Ron, I`m all for truce amongst my fellow stockholders , my intent	john mcknight	-	8/14/1997
6333	Well, Now that we are talking to talk rationally here, I will put in my two	Jim Ilchyshn	-	8/14/1997
6332	I'm all for getting some positive momentum going with regard to NPA's w	James Berg	-	8/13/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):