SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
MFN Mercury Finance
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1239 8 0 MFN
Emcee:  Tom Uhl Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
639 Lots of volume today. Anyone have on a take on it's meaning? ravenraven-12/2/1997
638 Dan: I can see why you would cut your losses, and I probably should do the samraven-12/2/1997
637 Sorry folks, I gave up on this one. The best of luck to all who stick it out. DanZ-12/2/1997
636 Dan, you wrote: <<I can't find any news on the Internet about the claJolie Renee-12/1/1997
635 Dale, I may be mistaken but I though there was a provision in the 1997 tax act Emec-11/30/1997
634 John N. Brincat has been nominated for a very special award, please visit this JEFF CHAPMAN-11/30/1997
633 I'm not a tax expert but I have heard this many times on other threads, thaDale Baker-11/30/1997
632 Dale, I'm just curious about your comment that short sellers wouldn't DanZ-11/30/1997
631 Short interest is 8.9 million down from a little over 9 million last month, accDale Baker-11/30/1997
630 If it's bought, I think most of us will be just fine with that. There are Emec-11/28/1997
629 I Guess you would have said the same think of CREAF @ 3 1/2. plain & simpleMichael Peterson-11/28/1997
628 mfn, like ctys, investors know its demise is near. People don't usually seStock Guru-11/28/1997
627 Fan, my point exactly! sgStock Guru-11/28/1997
626 Jolie and all, MFN may have found support at 3/4 x 13/16. May be time to buy ,Emec-11/28/1997
625 Paul, Applause and BRAVO for a most excellent post. You've said it all righJolie Renee-11/28/1997
624 Hi, Paul,thank you very much for your very comprehesive posts which give us a lxiao-Dong Fan-11/28/1997
623 In the case of MFN, even unlike most takeovers, there is a more compelling reaspaul jasper-11/28/1997
622 Fan, It is not at all unusual for a company losing money to be bought. An acquEmec-11/27/1997
621 Hi Jolie, glad to hear you! My question is if MFN has been losing money and wixiao-Dong Fan-11/27/1997
620 Paul, Excellent post. Thanks. I believe we have probably bottomed out at thisEmec-11/27/1997
619 Paul thanks for your reasoned and very informative post many of us have read fRon McKinnon-11/27/1997
618 Earlier this month when MFN announced the restatement of prior years' earnipaul jasper-11/27/1997
617 Bulgar, LOL!Emec-11/27/1997
616 Stock Guru, They do not seem to be in imminent danger of going bankrupt since tEmec-11/27/1997
615 Jolie... thanks for the post with the article... don't know what it is aboTHE KID-11/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News