SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
uniView Technologies - UVEW
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6895 7 0 UVEW
Emcee:  emichael Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6470 My break-even point is just over 28 cents. Damn. Guess I should have bailed at_Highlander-12/15/1997
6469 It would appear that if everybody votes NO on both issues (and any other hare-b_Highlander-12/15/1997
6468 Jon, the news is still not on Quote.com nor is it on EDGAR. (Edgar takes one daJoe Barker-12/15/1997
6467 Why no big press release over this news? Keep in mind that there is a special mJon Scott-12/15/1997
6466 These are cable boxes. I wonder what CM is referring to when they say they areJoe Barker-12/15/1997
6465 To all: Found the following this morning on "Wake-Up Call" on DLJ-diShanstar-12/15/1997
6464 Joe. let's just buy this thing and run w/it? {we paid for it already anywaChartgod-12/14/1997
6463 Lenny, Are you planning on calling Neil on this one? How does this guy live wPeter Fiala-12/14/1997
6462 Eric ...Good job!! What format are you keeping the database? Just a text fiChartgod-12/14/1997
6461 <<I felt I had better odds here!! But, we all did learn about a few of thEric Winterhalder-12/14/1997
6460 With so many people not following this stock so closely anymore, maybe we mightJoe Barker-12/14/1997
6459 To he**, w/Custer...He's in my dust.. And all others who have gotten burnedChartgod-12/14/1997
6458 Joe I was just kidding around, by suggesting after the reverse split that they JOHN E.DAGGS-12/14/1997
6457 John, the way that this filing is worded, it looks like they want to increase tJoe Barker-12/14/1997
6456 What Mr. Custer should do now is offer another IPO, to get the number of shareJOHN E.DAGGS-12/14/1997
6455 Joe, so do you think the headlines of the future will read: <i> Mr. PaChartgod-12/14/1997
6454 The worst part about this stock reverse, is the fact that it also makes an imprJoe Barker-12/14/1997
6453 Hi Eric.. I'm not, and agreed!! It really is a shame though, as they {Chartgod-12/14/1997
6452 <i>"Katz confirmed with me also that there are no intentions whatsoeJoe Barker-12/14/1997
6451 I hope nobody is really suprised by this...it was inevitable and represents theEric Winterhalder-12/14/1997
6450 Ed, I am not speaking on the whole thread for this, in fact...I would also likeChartgod-12/14/1997
6449 Is the logical way to read this to assume that Custer doesn't expect the stEd. Kelly-12/14/1997
6448 It sure looks that way to me!! IMO,FWIWO, {In My Own, For What It's Worth Chartgod-12/14/1997
6447 congratulations, weve all been fu#%@d, isnt is lovely.mrvn t. martian-12/14/1997
6446 Thx Harold, Looks like we'll jump to $2.50 a share!! :), {at least for aChartgod-12/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News