SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
T/FIF Portfolio
An SI Board Since August 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1073 31 0
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
648 Hi Rick, Thanks for your many thoughts on MEDX. I am not one to judge the comBRAVEHEART-3/3/1999
647 John: This PIII DHEA trial was *phisician sponsored *, mainly designed in CanaMiljenko Zuanic-3/3/1999
646 David: I had given the DHEA projects at NBIX and GNLB chances of success of zescaram(o)uche-3/2/1999
645 Did anyone expect DHEA to be successful against Alzheimer's? The EAAT deJohn Metcalf-3/2/1999
644 Any idea how "fugly" this is? Message 8119507 DAKLLCF-3/2/1999
643 David, Jeffrey, John, et al: Current accounting completely misses biotechs - wBiomaven-2/28/1999
642 Good point, John. Affymetrix would be another example of that type, I presume. jeffbas-2/28/1999
641 Bob, Mike, It's worth reminding people that part of the reason "suzboBiomaven-2/28/1999
640 You're missing something here, Joe. You *asked* for my opinions. It takesscaram(o)uche-2/28/1999
639 Rest assured this is my last post to you. Your " pump and dumps" commJOEBT1-2/28/1999
638 <Murphy's basic method is to add the amount of money a biotech has spenLLCF-2/28/1999
637 I agree, Jeffrey, and prefer your analysis to Murphy -:) One small cavil: amoJohn Metcalf-2/28/1999
636 Along the lines of your comments, isn't the amount spent each year on R&jeffbas-2/28/1999
635 Mike, The enviable, daunting Suzbounce portfolio, up a mere 64.94% from August RCMac-2/28/1999
634 >> Lately I've been thinking that I would do well to lighten uscaram(o)uche-2/28/1999
633 re: Mike Murphy: LSD, bank robbery, investment advice -- makes sense to me-:)John Metcalf-2/28/1999
632 Thread--especially newbies... I've found that sometimes it is good to re-reMike McFarland-2/28/1999
631 Yes, someone pasted the article here: Message 8059042 non-SI subscribers try:Pseudo Biologist-2/28/1999
630 Anyone see Micheal Murphy slammed in the WSJ??? Seemed a bit bitter to me... buLLCF-2/27/1999
629 Joe: I have addressed your suggestions and posts repeatedly. I don't thinscaram(o)uche-2/27/1999
628 Richard--RE your questions on IMGN, here is a post that addresses them messagesJOEBT1-2/27/1999
627 PB: We ain't got no topic. I hate third-tiers. ;-) >> show that ascaram(o)uche-2/27/1999
626 Rick, Some relevant (?) Medarex research <<These data demonstrate that hPseudo Biologist-2/27/1999
625 Jeffrey: MEDX is now really diversified from a science stand. I'd need toscaram(o)uche-2/27/1999
624 for the week..... Fidelity Selects: Biotch 41.35 42.44 27.01 scaram(o)uche-2/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News