SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
The Residential Real Estate Crash Index
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
306849 644 0 $HGX
Emcee:  patron_anejo_por_favor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
64807Should be another profitable day in housing land. Nothing beats making money shTravis_Bickle10/24/2006
64806Countrywide Financial Corp. on Tuesday said third-quarter net income for the thrTravis_Bickle10/24/2006
64805Re: MDC Results That's pretty bad. CC should be interesting. Savessaveslivesbyday10/24/2006
64804M.D.C. Holdings Announces Third Quarter Earnings; Reports Quarterly Home Orders Travis_Bickle10/24/2006
648034% is definitely shocking, but look who is making that prediction ... A bank PreCalculatedRisk10/24/2006
64802"real cash" is always a funny statement. The fact is that "real TheLineMan10/24/2006
64801'Up to 4% of America's mortgaged homeowners might lose their homes to foJohn Vosilla10/24/2006
64800'Lower taxes paid for with debt is suicide. Only the financially illiterate John Vosilla10/24/2006
647994 times as many home foreclosures predicted jsonline.com EXCERPT: Up to 4% of ACalculatedRisk10/24/2006
64798'Lots of pissed-off looking little old ladies.' Yeah those snowbirds paJohn Vosilla10/24/2006
64797" I think that point has been made repeatedly." If many people repeaNikole Wollerstein10/24/2006
64796Nontraditional Mortgages Don't Wane Under Warnings washingtonpost.com ExcerCalculatedRisk10/24/2006
64795If an Employer pays 12k and not the employee it is not a regressive tax. Why is Oblivious10/23/2006
64794sure they are contractors. But even if they were employees, the employer would Lizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64793I don't care about Bush. Why do employees pay 47% income tax? Are they indepOblivious10/23/2006
64792About the Residential Real Estate Crash - It seems there is increasing news abosaveslivesbyday10/23/2006
64791my point is that bush is a bad president. I think that point has been made repeLizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64790Why do you think the tax system is regressive? It does FLY. Wage earners pay monOblivious10/23/2006
64789DOW up 77% three years after Clinton tax increase in 1993. DOW up 53% three yearLes H10/23/2006
64788Nothing you don't know already, but here is a decent blog with some interestTH10/23/2006
64787I have repeatedly said that we have a REGRESSIVE TAX SYSTEM, therefore any surplLizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64786My point exactly, leave the private sector alone!Oblivious10/23/2006
64785-national debt - so -record surplus was an illusion -why do you assume the tax sOblivious10/23/2006
64784I find your premise implausible. "The man from the government is here to hElroy Jetson10/23/2006
64783Governments job is not to collect the last dollar on incremental income, but to Oblivious10/23/2006
64782<i>One smart thing that has been overlooked is the repatriation act Bush emishedlo10/23/2006
64781- national debt almost doubling - record surplus to record deficit in a few shorLizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64780So you are saying that the increased revenue outweighs the cut in taxes? CertaiThink4Yourself10/23/2006
64779What economic disaster are you referring?Oblivious10/23/2006
64778you are going to be all alone in your support of this economic disaster.Lizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64777well, suffice it to say I think the DOW is a different read entirely on Bush'Lizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64776Why do you assume tax cuts cost money? Overall net revenues has increased greatlOblivious10/23/2006
64775The point is that the debt is going up while the GDP is likely peaking and couldThink4Yourself10/23/2006
64774And, What was your point?Oblivious10/23/2006
64773Well since the debt is growing every year due to the interest, the GDP had betteThink4Yourself10/23/2006
64772Schilling on Corporate Profits forbes.comLes H10/23/2006
64771Who said GDP would contract?Oblivious10/23/2006
64770Hedge fund wants WCI board seat By Pat Beall >>>Something wicked thisChanceIs10/23/2006
64769When the GDP goes down due to the housing crash will the debt go down too?Think4Yourself10/23/2006
64768>>>because the interest on either loan is the same.<<< I can&ChanceIs10/23/2006
64767For the first time in my life I can't wait to vote. I don't even know aThink4Yourself10/23/2006
64766All time high GDP. Savings rate does not take into account all capital assets.Oblivious10/23/2006
64765I already voted (first day of early voting) and the voting office was doing pretTravis_Bickle10/23/2006
64764Don't forget All time high debt loads All time low savings rate The good tThink4Yourself10/23/2006
64763"Lower taxes paid for with debt is suicide" That is the crux of the pThink4Yourself10/23/2006
64762Lizzie, I know you know better than to compare the Dow Jones price from Bush'SouthFloridaGuy10/23/2006
64761"Are you one of those people who think that eating a lot of calories wonNikole Wollerstein10/23/2006
64760Re: <i>tax increase will not shrink the deficit</i> Are you one of Dan310/23/2006
64759The budget deficit isn't a big deal as a % of GDP and given low rate environSouthFloridaGuy10/23/2006
64758Of course it is classic : Economy 101 basic economic educationNikole Wollerstein10/23/2006
64757When was first book about enivitable USA financial collapse was published? 1983?Nikole Wollerstein10/23/2006
64756What horrible performance?? All time high DOW, alltime high house ownership low Nikole Wollerstein10/23/2006
64755It's gonna be a long drawn out brutal housing downturn. Isn't the mortgaSouthFloridaGuy10/23/2006
64754Which Bush are you referring to. What is your point of reference for unfunded exOblivious10/23/2006
64753I'll take Carter over Bush. The debate is not Reagan vs. Carter. Carter waLizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64752I'll take Reagan over Carter anytime.Oblivious10/23/2006
64751Taxes have been raised since Ronald Reagan was president. Taxes have been lowereOblivious10/23/2006
64750Lower taxes are alway better when financed with lower expenditures. Lower taxesElroy Jetson10/23/2006
64749Have taxes been lowered? No. They have been shifted to future taxpayers ... CalculatedRisk10/23/2006
64748I have been better off no matter who was president. Lower taxes are much better Oblivious10/23/2006
64747I'll admit, you sure love your debt. You don't yet have enough experienElroy Jetson10/23/2006
64746The latest Home-Builder news. . The Centex Southern CalifoElroy Jetson10/23/2006
64745<I>but reducing the total debt will lead to recession. </i> AHHA! Lizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64744you can't blame Bush's horrible performance on various bubbles, sorry. Lizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64743Did you noticed that something happened before and after Bush was elected: PeoplNikole Wollerstein10/23/2006
64742Deficit/GDP should decline slightly but reducing the total debt will lead to rNikole Wollerstein10/23/2006
64741oh please, the dollar has crashed 40%, and the DOW and Nas are lower than when BLizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64740Financial strategy "pioneered by Ronald Reagan was huge successes: EmploymeNikole Wollerstein10/23/2006
64739This financial strategy "Grandpa's got a new credit card" was pionElroy Jetson10/23/2006
64738real cash is getting vaporized at this point. but if you are getting vaporized TheStockFairy10/23/2006
64737You are suggesting a "stay the course" approach to financing the goverTravis_Bickle10/23/2006
64736You do not have any sense of reality: DOW up 50% since Bush Tax Cut 2003 And taxNikole Wollerstein10/23/2006
64735Re: <i>I'd rather do an exotic no money down right now, because if priDan310/23/2006
64734I think we could be seeing market strength as a result of an awareness that the Lizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64733Results of the infamous naples housing auction: housingbubblebust.comTravis_Bickle10/23/2006
64732"it seems they should focus more on cobbling together 80 grand for the DP lTravis_Bickle10/23/2006
64731You originally indicated a price range of $400 to $500k for a starter home. Of Micawber10/23/2006
64730It might be crazy to buy with real money right now unless you're buying the J. P.10/23/2006
64729WCI closed at the low for the day on solid volume and there was a lower sale in Travis_Bickle10/23/2006
64728LOL 3 DOLLARS?! I think you meant $3K. Still a joke though. Where is this, TOLizzie Tudor10/23/2006
64727a percentage of the population doesn't care about price, they care about payTheStockFairy10/23/2006
64726Interesting factoid heard on "Foreign Affairs" on TV thsi Sunday: &qubentway10/23/2006
64725She probably makes 25K, she's only 3 days a week because of the 2 kids. So J. P.10/23/2006
64724DJ GSE Chiefs Comment On Housing Correction, ARM Resets 10/23/2006 Dow Jones Paul Kern10/23/2006
64723Mortgage Originations Fall 16% In First Half Of 2006 DOW JONES NEWSWIRES By NChanceIs10/23/2006
64722If we stay in a trading range of say 4.6-5.3% that is very stimulative and suppoJohn Vosilla10/23/2006
64721WCI forward p/e up to 54x: finance.yahoo.comTravis_Bickle10/23/2006
64720Housing and automobiles are not going along for the ride and they are going the Think4Yourself10/23/2006
64719Treasury yields have backed up in recent days/weeks- 10 yr yielding 4.83-4.84 todamainman10/23/2006
64718So what's this all mean for those big rfid projects I keep hearing about frodamainman10/23/2006
64717Chicago Natural Resources Conference Highlights globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.mishedlo10/23/2006
64716Such a drop in transaction volume seems to be the story in bubble markets for noJohn Vosilla10/23/2006
64715A good sign for those heavy to the short side these days is the most builders anJohn Vosilla10/23/2006
64714HBs are trying to drop, but WM is cutting cap-ex, so we rally on. A true sign ofSmiling Bob10/23/2006
64713Let's face facts. If the religious texts are right we are ALL going to hellThink4Yourself10/23/2006
64712damn, I need a new strategy. <gggg>Ramsey Su10/23/2006
64711Rent’s Bite Is Big in Kansas, Too By SUSAN SAULNY nytimes.com OLATHE, Kan. — Nbentway10/23/2006
64710A French writer named Marcel Ayme (I think) wrote a short story about a terribleTommaso10/23/2006
64709And repentance is not for those who go on doing evil deeds, until when death comSultan10/23/2006
64708ot: There's a catch that most people choose to ignore. You get one shot at Think4Yourself10/23/2006
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):