SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K
An SI Board Since February 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7491 24 0 CSHK
Emcee:  John Chapman Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6541 Guidelines 1 and 2 used by slammers found at Message 7360010 1. Be anonymous, oJohn Chapman-2/4/1999
6540 Indeed, you are on to something there John. It seems that there is a sinister cjhild-2/4/1999
6539 Ted you must live on this thread as it only took you 16 minutes to respond to CJohn Chapman-2/3/1999
6538TEDennis-2/3/1999
6537 Ted that is good and you have a good sense of humor and you do not get ticked francis terry-2/3/1999
6536 Francis: Re: "i can handle it but can you?" Absolutely! All it costTEDennis-2/3/1999
6535 Ted money all gone, now we just sit back and relax and get on with our lives.francis terry-2/3/1999
6534 Francis: Very insightful. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. TED TEDennis-2/3/1999
6533 To Ted: EOM---francis terryfrancis terry-2/3/1999
6532 Confusing indeed. <eom> CatLady-2/3/1999
6531 Well typically that is how it is handled in a stock split that the dividend rigjhild-2/3/1999
6530 I'd really like to see a definitive answer to the question of how the spinCatLady-2/3/1999
6529 Better to direct that question to Rhonda. I find the idea of temporarily lockinjhild-2/3/1999
6528 Question? CSHK = Y2K <NA> = Kitty Litter Is that correct? Also, what Pennygod-2/3/1999
6527 Not suggesting anything, just wondering why you decoupled that much of the valujhild-2/3/1999
6526 What would you suggest the COmpany do? CASHCO-2/3/1999
6525 So since the owners of the new shares are already determined and as these dividjhild-2/3/1999
6524 Thanks for the spinoff clarification, Rhonda. So, effectively, from a stockholTEDennis-2/3/1999
6523 In response to queries about the A.R. Brooks Spinoff please refer to the origiCASHCO-2/3/1999
6522 Excellent point John!!!! Geoff Altman-2/3/1999
6521 There was no spinoff AND no news about why it didn't happen. All is silentPennygod-2/3/1999
6520 Francis: What ever happened to the ARBrooks spinoff? It was supposed to happenTEDennis-2/3/1999
6519 John: Re: Motive ... This stock has very little volume when there is no activiTEDennis-2/3/1999
6518 Francis: Has to be a motive. However, there are some in this world who need no John Chapman-2/3/1999
6517 Yes that is so.----francisfrancis terry-2/3/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News