SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Iomega Thread without Iomega
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10072 15 0 IOM
Emcee:  Jock Hutchinson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6572 Solid support at 8 but it won't recover to pre-announcement today... LooksAndrew Bausk-1/22/1999
6571 <<Wouldn't it be fun if IOM actually turned a profit in the first QtrNaggrachi-1/22/1999
6570 " Great news!! Promo on jaz2 ext. scsi drives!!!! 5200 out the door so farrll-1/22/1999
6569 Great news!! Promo on jaz2 ext. scsi drives!!!! 5200 out the door so far today.s. bateh-1/22/1999
6568 I think we have a good chance at a rally back to 9 in the last 15 min to half hKevin-1/22/1999
6567 "Thursday, yesterday. <<a lot has changed>> for who? " rll-1/22/1999
6566 Are there risks involved with the clik drives? They clearly have to demonstratepascal ho-1/22/1999
6565 Darrel, I have been an IOM bull for long time but i am getting tired of it. ButSenthil Sankarappan-1/22/1999
6564 >>>My prediction for 1999 EPS is .70, regardless of what Glore does toBobo Bear-1/22/1999
6563 Thursday, yesterday. <<a lot has changed>> for who? if IOM was atD.J.Smyth-1/22/1999
6562 Darrell, I agree. Before I left my office this morning I bought more at 7 7/8Alan Rosen-1/22/1999
6561 Tom, ive been a lot rougher ones than this over the last 25yrs....no problem s. bateh-1/22/1999
6560 Hang on Batch, this is some of your basic training that is to condition you forThomas L Nielsen-1/22/1999
6559 Darrell - I don't think 16 by mid-year is unrealistic at all. But they wiCogito-1/22/1999
6558 Darrell, When was the last time you talked with this analyst? If it was priorrll-1/22/1999
6557 I don't know Allen, I think you'll see $16 before mid-year; too many vD.J.Smyth-1/22/1999
6556 Tom, lifes tuff.....what can i say s. bateh-1/22/1999
6555 Edwin - I think the Street was reacting more to the lower top line numbers andCogito-1/22/1999
6554 Allen re: >> But I also think that IOM is, once again, dead money for nowReseller-1/22/1999
6553 >>A lot of stop loss orders got tripped. But it doesn't feel like lasCogito-1/22/1999
6552 Like I expected, looks like great action by a few big boys ... looks like they Sonny-1/22/1999
6551 Bill: I agree... An upbeat Conference Call... I especially like the referenceJames Strauss-1/22/1999
6550 i sent CNBC a quick email at the address provided by someone on this thread. imr.mark-1/22/1999
6549 Linda: It's a positive sign that Ted Briscoe will continue to contribute tJames Strauss-1/22/1999
6548 I agree that the call sounded a positive note. And it answered some of the 'Ben Antanaitis-1/22/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News