SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
659 I think you can get a USRX from MUEI if you ask, BUT I didn't think it was Jeffery E. Forrest-3/5/1997
658 FF, that's the understatement of the day fer sher. >><i>DELL, Jeffery E. Forrest-3/5/1997
657 I think you can get now...no? But things are starting to look better to me on Scrapps-3/5/1997
656 Xy I'm sure your goal was to be informative, however I'm not sure we waScrapps-3/5/1997
655 Jeffery, The way I see it, this is one of the first tangible pluses for USR inFred Fahmy-3/5/1997
654 I see where COMS made a deal with Micron. Cool! I guess we'll be seeing x2 Jeffery E. Forrest-3/5/1997
653 Scrapps: Well, we have too many threads dealing COMS/USRX, and I am sorry for Xpiderman-3/5/1997
652 Scrapps, I just found the same article in the 3COM thread. That makes four timGlenn D. Rudolph-3/5/1997
651 I know Xy is running around posting an article on all three threads which has aScrapps-3/5/1997
650 "Boy we don't need anymore threads to follow, let's let that x2 onGlenn D. Rudolph-3/5/1997
649 Boy we don't need anymore threads to follow, let's let that x2 one die Scrapps-3/5/1997
648 U.S. Robotics aims to calm merger fears CHICAGO, March 5 (Reuter) - U.S. RobotXpiderman-3/5/1997
647 USR shareholders give Casey a thumbs-up March 5, 1997 2:30 PM ET CHICAGO -- Xpiderman-3/5/1997
646 Posted this on the wrong thread techstocks.com thanks Boy did i f--k that upPat Buglak-3/5/1997
645 Hey Jeffy you're back! that's GREAT! and thanks for the URL I'll Scrapps-3/5/1997
644 i hope yor not serious, it's was a joke son, a jokepaul jackson-3/5/1997
643 I saw it and thought of you immediately<GGGGG> I also see where MindSpriJeffery E. Forrest-3/5/1997
642 How does your personal phychic know anything about CSCO?RUILIN ZHAO-3/5/1997
641 9:27 B 58 1/2 Ask 58. For USRX of course. Bid 34 5/8 COMS. LindaLinda Pearson-3/5/1997
640 ALL just some 3COM/MUEI stuff: biz.yahoo.com LindaLinda Pearson-3/5/1997
639 Agreed. And today looks like another gap up at the open. Current bid 34 1/8 atdavid decamp-3/5/1997
638 i called the friends psychic network, and my personal psyphic told me that cscpaul jackson-3/5/1997
637 Crzy Joe, >WHY? cause more confusion? When in doubt, its better not to say Hassell Anderson-3/5/1997
636 Two key technical events occured in the price of COMS: 1) Opened higher than pMichael Shumberger-3/5/1997
635 Joe, I think you are like most of us.....caught up in the short term. Lettom dooly-3/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News