SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
TLAB info?
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7342 94 0 TLAB
Emcee:  Bob Monard Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6592 <i>"The Street and us (the small investors) a little more insight inMikeM54321-2/25/2000
6591 Nevin, I'm wondering the exact same thing. Besides the undervalued argumeBretsky-2/25/2000
6590 Bretsky, I agree with your assessment. The question I have is if TLAB can'Nevin S.-2/25/2000
6589 OT. When do you expect LOR's sector of business to "take off"? gmccon-2/25/2000
6588 As D Sanders says, "BOTH". His comments weren't too satisfying tBretsky-2/25/2000
6587 So is this an "old economy" company now? It appears that Wall StreeNevin S.-2/25/2000
6586 I'm out too. I don't like the competition here anymore. I'm takinDavid Silverman-2/25/2000
6585 Mike, I have decided to take a small loss in TLAB and buy LOR. SamSam Citron-2/25/2000
6584 Sorry if I sound a little whiny. Actually I was VERY small time then and stillBretsky-2/25/2000
6583 Bretsky, Question? "A disappointed, 5 year long who is losing the faith.Matt Quigley-2/25/2000
6582 <i>"Don't write off TLAB just yet."</i> Sam- We mustMikeM54321-2/25/2000
6581 Cienalab??mike thomas-2/25/2000
6580 I bought in '97 because of this purchase. GG is a visionary that I respect.DMaA-2/25/2000
6579 Mike, I don't understand how you can infer from GG's article that he iSam Citron-2/25/2000
6578 Feb 25 2000 7:46AM Tellabs Inc (TLAB) FBCO gbh-2/25/2000
6577 <i>"SCMR and TLAB being different? Have you looked into the SN16000 MikeM54321-2/25/2000
6576 Aren't ANALysts, well screwed up? Stock is cheap , no doubt. P.S. JosephP314159d-2/25/2000
6575 Now we are getting somewhere, Pain. Sorry Bretsky, but your comment is a necesP314159d-2/25/2000
6574 We probably need a share buyback by the company to get a "quick" reboKAF-2/24/2000
6573 Gary- Welcome to TLAB. ZO...hmm<g>. It wasn't him that wrote the artiMikeM54321-2/24/2000
6572 Mike, that would be ZO from the NN thread that predicted the demise of TLAB. Hgbh-2/24/2000
6571 Thread- In case anyone is interested, I did a Q4 CC summary on the Last Mile thMikeM54321-2/24/2000
6570 Hi Sam- I thought it was at the end of this Forbes article at: forbes.com ...buMikeM54321-2/24/2000
6569 Thanks, Joe...you said it all! What has always been great about this company isydney-2/24/2000
6568 From RB: CNBC 2/24/00 - 2:56:41 PM .....Meanwhile tellabs taking the spotlightJoseph Hertel-2/24/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):