SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
XCL!!
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1260 7 0 XCL
Emcee:  T. Ramani Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
660 >where is the interest on the money they are going to have to borrow to builScotty-10/13/1997
659 Your analysis is awfully close to mine in #577. You know what they say "MMeridian-10/13/1997
658 Whats with all the bad mouthing of XCL? Price is holding up and I ahve not soldElmer Flugum-10/13/1997
657 I'm sorry that so many of you are pisst at this security....I for one heed stockid-10/13/1997
656 Joe: As I have stated I don't blame anyone but myself for listening to DoTHMichael-10/13/1997
655 < The company is dealing with China and no one knows what will happen witjoseph w renfrow-10/13/1997
654 Hans, I agree with Dr Meade, this stock looks like it's building a good basBrian Gross-10/13/1997
653 Hans, you did not a mistake buying ! DR. MEADEDR. MEADE-10/13/1997
652 This came just to late. I got in today and you make me feel sorry, though I stuHans-10/13/1997
651 Jon: I am one of those people who invested in this stock on the advice of an iTHMichael-10/13/1997
650 where is the interest on the money they are going to have to borrow to build alK.Martin-10/13/1997
649 Many people have been wondering about XCL's earnings. Here's my analysScotty-10/13/1997
648 APA was mentioned on CNBC this morning by Susan Byrne of Westwood Management. XTom Shutters-10/13/1997
647 [Joseph] Then you are smarter than most. I agree, nuff said, for now. Jon I. Brolliar-10/13/1997
646 <<Many who got burned a few years ago are finally able to recoup sojoseph w renfrow-10/13/1997
645 Dr. Meade, I agree with you on all accounts except, today's situation stillJon I. Brolliar-10/13/1997
644 Objectively, JB, the "trading history" of this co. is no longer pertiDR. MEADE-10/12/1997
643 [XCL IMHO] News is few and far between on this one. Many who got burned a fewJon I. Brolliar-10/12/1997
642 365 is 150,000 more than 7x52. Either way I don't get near 365 million dolKenneth E. De Paul-10/12/1997
641 Excellent post, thanks a bunch Bob...Elmer Flugum-10/12/1997
640 Sometimes I move TOO fast for my own good.Elmer Flugum-10/12/1997
639 365x or (7x52) x : either oneDR. MEADE-10/12/1997
638 I know, I did not understand the 7 in the equation. 365 days per year times 20Kenneth E. De Paul-10/12/1997
637 Lots of newcomers with lots of questions. Pure and simple, here are the pros aDan O-10/12/1997
636 Tom: I hope I did not confuse you. The report that came out yesterday was on XCBob (Hijacked)-10/12/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News